Answer By law4u team
In India, the legal framework for marriage currently does not provide recognition to same-sex couples. While the Special Marriage Act, 1954, allows civil marriages across religions, the law has traditionally interpreted marriage as a union between a man and a woman. As a result, same-sex couples are not able to register their marriage under existing legislation, leaving them without formal legal recognition despite advances in other areas of LGBTQ+ rights. 1. Legal Background The decriminalization of consensual same-sex relationships through the striking down of Section 377 in 2018 was a landmark decision affirming the constitutional rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. The judgment recognized the rights to privacy, equality, and personal liberty for adults engaging in same-sex relationships. However, this ruling did not extend to legalizing or recognizing same-sex marriage. Courts have emphasized that marriage is governed by statutory laws, and any recognition of same-sex marriage requires legislative intervention rather than judicial interpretation alone. 2. Current Status of Same-Sex Marriage Under the existing legal framework: Same-sex couples cannot approach a Marriage Officer under the Special Marriage Act for registration. Ceremonial or personal celebrations of marriage have no legal effect in terms of marital rights. Legal protections such as inheritance rights, spousal benefits, adoption, and tax advantages, which are tied to formal marriage, are unavailable to same-sex couples. 3. Judicial Recognition of Rights While same-sex marriage is not recognized, courts have acknowledged certain rights of LGBTQ+ individuals and couples: Adults in same-sex relationships have the constitutional right to cohabit and live together without interference. Same-sex relationships can be recognized as a family unit for the purpose of protection from harassment, domestic disputes, and other civil matters. Courts have reiterated that while personal liberty and dignity are protected, the formal recognition of marriage remains a legislative responsibility. 4. Legislative Developments Discussions and proposals have been made to amend existing marriage laws to include same-sex marriage, including efforts to modify the Special Marriage Act. However, no such amendments have been enacted, and the government has indicated that any legal recognition would require careful legislative consideration. This leaves same-sex couples in a position where their relationship is socially and constitutionally acknowledged but legally unrecognized as a marriage. 5. Alternative Arrangements for Same-Sex Couples In the absence of formal recognition, same-sex couples often adopt alternative measures to protect their rights and interests: Cohabitation agreements, wills, and powers of attorney can safeguard property, inheritance, and decision-making authority. Certain states allow same-sex couples limited recognition for protection under domestic law or inclusion in welfare schemes. Legal protections focus primarily on personal autonomy, protection from discrimination, and the right to live together, rather than on marital rights. 6. Challenges and Implications The lack of formal recognition of same-sex marriage in India has significant implications: Couples are unable to access legal benefits that married couples enjoy, including inheritance, adoption rights, medical decision-making, and tax advantages. Social legitimacy and legal security are limited, creating uncertainty for couples in long-term relationships. Although courts have advanced recognition of certain rights, comprehensive equality in marriage remains contingent on legislative reform. 7. Future Prospects Legal recognition of same-sex marriage in India remains a subject of active debate. Constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity provide a strong foundation for potential reforms, but formal legal change requires parliamentary legislation. Activists and scholars continue to advocate for marriage equality to ensure same-sex couples have full access to legal rights, protections, and social legitimacy comparable to heterosexual couples. Until such reforms are enacted, same-sex couples continue to rely on constitutional protections for personal liberty and cohabitation rather than the legal status of marriage.