In motor accident cases in India, comparative negligence is a legal principle used to determine the degree of fault or liability of each party involved in the accident. Here's how it applies: Definition: Comparative negligence, also known as proportionate liability, acknowledges that more than one party may contribute to an accident. It allows the court to apportion fault among the parties based on their respective degrees of negligence. Assessment of Negligence: When determining liability in a motor accident case, the court considers the actions or omissions of each party leading up to the accident. This includes factors such as speeding, reckless driving, failure to obey traffic laws, and any other behaviors that may have contributed to the collision. Apportionment of Fault: After assessing the evidence, the court assigns a percentage of fault to each party involved in the accident. For example, if one driver was speeding but the other driver ran a red light, the court may find one driver 70% at fault and the other driver 30% at fault. Impact on Compensation: The principle of comparative negligence affects the amount of compensation awarded to the parties involved. In India, compensation is typically reduced in proportion to the percentage of fault attributed to the injured party. For instance, if a court determines that a plaintiff's negligence contributed 20% to the accident, the compensation awarded to the plaintiff may be reduced by 20%. Contributory Negligence: Some states in India follow the principle of contributory negligence, where a party who is even slightly at fault may be barred from recovering any compensation. However, many jurisdictions have moved towards comparative negligence, which allows recovery even if the injured party is partially responsible for the accident. Role of Insurance: Insurance companies play a significant role in motor accident cases by assessing fault and negotiating settlements with injured parties. They may use the principle of comparative negligence to determine the extent of their policyholder's liability and the amount of compensation payable to the injured party. Overall, comparative negligence provides a fair and equitable way to allocate fault in motor accident cases, taking into account the actions of all parties involved and ensuring that compensation reflects each party's degree of responsibility for the accident.