In India, the procedure for challenging the appointment of an arbitrator is governed by Section 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. If a party wishes to challenge the appointment of an arbitrator, they can do so by filing an application before the relevant court. Here's a general overview of the procedure for challenging the appointment of an arbitrator in India: Filing of Application: The aggrieved party must file an application with the appropriate court challenging the appointment of the arbitrator. The application must be filed within the time limit prescribed by law, which is typically 30 days from the receipt of the notice of appointment of the arbitrator or from the date when the circumstances giving rise to the challenge became known to the party. Grounds for Challenge: The application must specify the grounds on which the appointment of the arbitrator is being challenged. The grounds for challenge are limited and specified under Section 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Common grounds for challenge may include: The arbitrator does not possess the qualifications agreed upon by the parties. The arbitrator does not meet the requirements specified under the arbitration agreement or applicable law. The arbitrator is biased or lacks impartiality. The arbitrator is unable to perform their duties or is otherwise disqualified under the law. Service of Notice: The court will issue a notice to the parties involved in the arbitration proceedings, including the arbitrator whose appointment is being challenged, and provide an opportunity for them to respond to the application. Hearing and Decision: The court will conduct a hearing on the application and consider the arguments and evidence presented by the parties. Based on the merits of the case and the grounds for challenge, the court will make a decision on whether to uphold or set aside the appointment of the arbitrator. Replacement of Arbitrator: If the court sets aside the appointment of the arbitrator, it may also order the replacement of the arbitrator with a new arbitrator in accordance with the procedure specified in the arbitration agreement or applicable law. Appeal: Parties aggrieved by the decision of the court may have the option to appeal the decision to a higher court, depending on the applicable procedural rules and laws. It's important to note that the challenge to the appointment of an arbitrator must be raised promptly and within the prescribed time limits to avoid any procedural hurdles or objections. Additionally, parties should seek legal advice and representation to navigate the process effectively and protect their rights and interests in arbitration proceedings.