Under Indian law, hate speech and incitement to violence are addressed through various provisions in the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Constitution, and other laws: Indian Penal Code (IPC): Section 153A: Prohibits promoting enmity between different groups on the grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and engaging in acts likely to incite violence. Section 295A: Punishes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings. Section 505: Deals with statements or broadcasts that cause fear or alarm and incite violence. Constitution of India: Article 19(1)(a): Guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression but this right is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2), particularly in cases of national security, public order, decency, morality, and defamation. Other laws: Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 66A): (Though it was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015 for being overly broad) It had dealt with sending offensive messages via communication service or platforms. Communal Violence Law (if applicable): In extreme cases, hate speech could be treated under communal violence laws. Courts in India have upheld that speech or expression must not incite violence, hate, or division between communities, and any expression that crosses this line can be criminally prosecuted.

Dear Client, The Indian legal system takes a firm stance against hate speech and incitement to violence to maintain public order and protect individual dignity. These offenses are addressed through a combination of constitutional provisions, statutory laws, and judicial interpretations. 1. Constitutional Provisions • Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. • However, this right is not absolute. Article 19(2) permits reasonable restrictions on free speech in the interests of sovereignty, public order, decency, morality, and preventing incitement to an offense. 2. Statutory Provisions Provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) The BNS, 2023, directly addresses hate speech and incitement to violence through the following sections: • Section 300 (Promoting Enmity Between Groups): Criminalizes acts that promote enmity between different groups based on religion, race, language, or other grounds, and acts that disturb harmony. Punishment: Imprisonment up to five years, or a fine, or both. • Section 301 (Statements Conducing to Public Mischief): Penalizes the making, publishing, or circulating of statements or rumours intended to incite violence or cause alarm, leading to disturbance of public order. Punishment: Imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both. • Section 302 (Outraging Religious Feelings): Penalizes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings by insulting religious beliefs or practices. Punishment: Imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both. • Section 303 (Statements Against National Integration): Criminalizes assertions or activities prejudicial to national integration or aimed at promoting enmity between groups. Punishment: Imprisonment up to five years, or a fine, or both. 3. Election-Related Hate Speech • Representation of the People Act, 1951 (Section 8): Disqualifies candidates convicted of offenses involving hate speech or promoting enmity. • Section 123(3A): Deems appeals to religion, race, caste, or community for electoral gains as a corrupt practice. 4. Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 With the rise of digital communication, hate speech online is regulated under: • Section 69A: Allows the government to block public access to online content in the interest of public order or to prevent incitement to violence. • Section 66F: Penalizes cyber terrorism, including acts that disrupt communal harmony. Conclusion Indian law recognizes the need to strike a balance between protecting freedom of expression and preventing hate speech or incitement to violence. While free speech is a constitutional right, it cannot extend to acts that harm public order, communal harmony, or individual dignity. The legal framework is comprehensive but requires stringent enforcement and continuous judicial oversight to address emerging challenges, particularly in the digital age. Hope this answer helps you.

Dear Client, In India, the legal framework addressing hate speech and incitement to violence is multifaceted, involving various statutes and judicial interpretations. Here’s an overview of the key legal provisions and procedures for handling cases related to hate speech and incitement to violence: 1. Constitutional Framework Freedom of Speech and Expression • Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. However, this right is subject to reasonable restrictions as outlined in Article 19(2), which allows limitations in the interest of public order, morality, and incitement to an offense. 2. Relevant Legal Provisions Provisions in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 196: Prohibition of Hate Speech • Section 196(1) prohibits speech that promotes enmity between different groups based on religion, race, language, or community. It criminalizes actions intended to incite violence or create fear among members of these groups. • The punishment for violating this section can extend to three years of imprisonment or fines, particularly if the offense occurs in places of worship or during religious ceremonies, where penalties can increase to five years. Representation of the People Act, 1951 • Section 125: Specifically targets hate speech in the context of elections. It punishes any person who promotes enmity or hatred based on religion, race, caste, community, or language during election campaigns. 3. Procedures for Handling Disputes Filing Complaints: Individuals who believe they have been victims of hate speech can file complaints with local police authorities. The police are obligated to register a First Information Report (FIR) if there is sufficient evidence of an offense under the relevant sections of the IPC. Investigation: Upon receiving a complaint, law enforcement agencies will conduct an investigation. This may involve gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and reviewing any relevant communications or media. Prosecution: If sufficient evidence is found, the police will file a charge sheet in court. The prosecution will then present its case against the accused based on the evidence collected during the investigation. 4. Judicial Oversight Role of Courts: Courts play a critical role in adjudicating hate speech cases. They assess whether the speech in question constitutes hate speech based on its content, intent, and potential harm. The Supreme Court has emphasized that hate speech must be evaluated within its context and has provided guidelines for determining whether specific instances qualify as hate speech. Suo Moto Actions: In significant cases involving hate speech that threatens public order or communal harmony, courts may take suo moto cognizance (on their own accord) to ensure that appropriate actions are taken against offenders without waiting for formal complaints. 5. Challenges in Enforcement Despite these provisions, enforcing laws against hate speech poses challenges: • Ambiguity in Definitions: The lack of a clear statutory definition for "hate speech" complicates enforcement. • Political Sensitivities: Cases involving political figures or sensitive communal issues often face delays or reluctance from authorities to act decisively. Conclusion The law in India addresses hate speech and incitement to violence through provisions in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and other relevant statutes. While there are established procedures for filing complaints and prosecuting offenders, challenges remain in effectively enforcing these laws due to ambiguities and political contexts. Ongoing judicial interpretations continue to shape how these laws are applied, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that protects free speech while curbing harmful expressions that threaten public order and communal harmony. Hope this answer helps you.

Appeal against acquittal us 420 406 ipc landmark judgement of punjab and haryana high court or Supreme Court judgement