- 25-Dec-2024
- Family Law Guides
Admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted but they may operate as estoppels under the provisions hereinafter contained.
Statements by persons who cannot be called as witnesses
This section clarifies that admissions made by a party are not definitive proof of the facts they assert. Instead, while they can imply a certain stance or acceptance of a matter, they can also prevent the party from later disputing that matter in court under certain conditions, known as estoppels.
A: Section 25 states that admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted.
A: Yes, admissions may operate as estoppels under specific provisions.
A: An admission can imply acceptance of a fact but does not serve as definitive proof.
- Example 1: If a party admits to owing a debt, this admission does not automatically prove the debt but may prevent the party from arguing later that they do not owe it.
- Example 2: In a property dispute, if a party admits to having used a portion of land, they may be estopped from later denying that they had any rights to that land.
Section 25 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, indicates that while admissions are not definitive proof, they can create legal consequences that prevent parties from contradicting their earlier statements in court, functioning as estoppels.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
