- 25-Dec-2024
- Family Law Guides
The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial.
Section 34 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, emphasizes the importance of previous judgments, orders, or decrees that can bar a court from entertaining a new suit or trial. It establishes that these prior legal decisions are crucial in determining a court's jurisdiction over a case.
A1: It addresses the relevance of previous judgments, orders, or decrees that can bar a court from taking cognizance of a new suit or holding a trial.
A2: A previous judgment is considered relevant when it legally prevents a court from taking cognizance of a suit or conducting a trial.
A3: If a relevant previous judgment exists, the court must consider whether it should take cognizance of the new suit or proceed with the trial.
Section 34 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, underscores the significance of prior legal judgments in determining a court's authority to hear a new case. It ensures that established legal principles are upheld, preventing unnecessary duplication of trials and maintaining judicial efficiency.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.