- 24-Dec-2024
- Family Law Guides
(1) When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law or of science or art, or any other field, or as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions, the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art, or any other field, or in questions as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions are relevant facts and such persons are called experts.
Illustrations:
(2) When in a proceeding, the court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to any information transmitted or stored in any computer resource or any other electronic or digital form, the opinion of the Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, is a relevant fact.
Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-section, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence shall be an expert.
Section 39 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, addresses the relevance of expert opinions in court proceedings. It states that when the court needs to make judgments on matters involving foreign law, science, art, handwriting identification, or digital evidence, the opinions of qualified experts in those fields are considered relevant facts. The section also specifies the role of an Examiner of Electronic Evidence as an expert in cases involving digital information.
A1: Section 39 focuses on the relevance of expert opinions in legal proceedings concerning foreign law, science, art, handwriting identification, and digital evidence.
A2: An expert is defined as a person specially skilled in foreign law, science, art, handwriting, finger impressions, or digital evidence.
A3: Yes, the opinions of experts regarding the symptoms produced by the poison are relevant in such cases.
A4: The opinion of the Examiner of Electronic Evidence is considered a relevant fact when the court needs to form an opinion on information transmitted or stored in digital formats.
A5: An example is when the court needs to determine whether a document was written by a specific person, and the opinions of experts regarding the handwriting are considered relevant.
- In a case where the cause of death is disputed, experts may be called to testify about the symptoms of poisoning, helping the court determine whether poison was involved.
- If a person’s sanity is questioned during a trial, experts may provide insights into the symptoms of unsoundness of mind to assist the court in making a judgment.
- In handwriting analysis, if a document is claimed to be written by an individual, experts can compare it to known samples to ascertain authorship.
Section 39 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, emphasizes the importance of expert opinions in court proceedings. It allows for the inclusion of specialized knowledge in areas such as foreign law, science, handwriting analysis, and digital evidence, thereby enhancing the court's ability to make informed decisions based on relevant expert insights.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.