Law4u - Made in India

What Is BSA Section 44?

Answer By law4u team

Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 - Section 44: Opinion on relationship, when relevant.

When the Court has to form an opinion as to the relationship of one person to another, the opinion, expressed by conduct, as to the existence of such relationship, of any person who, as a member of the family or otherwise, has special means of knowledge on the subject, is a relevant fact:

Provided that such opinion shall not be sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under the Divorce Act, 1869, or in prosecution under sections 82 and 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Illustrations.

(a) The question is, whether A and B were married. The fact that they were usually received and treated by their friends as husband and wife, is relevant.

(b) The question is, whether A was the legitimate son of B. The fact that A was always treated as such by members of the family, is relevant.

Brefe Detail

This section outlines how opinions regarding personal relationships can be considered relevant in court. It specifies that opinions expressed by those with special knowledge of the relationships, such as family members, can be taken into account. However, it clarifies that such opinions are not sufficient to prove marriage in certain legal contexts.

Question & Answers

Q1: What type of opinions are considered relevant under Section 44?

A1: Opinions expressed by individuals who have special knowledge of the relationship, typically family members, are considered relevant.

Q2: Are opinions sufficient to prove marriage in court?

A2: No, such opinions are not sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under the Divorce Act, 1869, or in prosecutions under sections 82 and 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Q3: Can the treatment of individuals by their friends be considered as evidence of a relationship?

A3: Yes, if A and B are treated by their friends as husband and wife, it is relevant evidence regarding their marital status.

Q4: How does this section relate to the legitimacy of a child?

A4: The fact that A is treated as the legitimate son of B by family members can be relevant in establishing the relationship.

Example

1. If a child is consistently introduced as the son of a couple in social settings, this behavior can indicate their relationship.

2. In a court case determining if a couple was married, testimonies from friends about how the couple interacted and was perceived can be considered.

Summary

Section 44 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 allows for the consideration of opinions on personal relationships from those with special knowledge, such as family members. It underscores that while such opinions can provide relevant context, they do not suffice to prove legal marital status in specific judicial proceedings.

Our Verified Advocates

Get expert legal advice instantly.

Advocate Amit Shukla

Advocate Amit Shukla

Civil, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, Landlord & Tenant, Court Marriage, Cheque Bounce

Get Advice
Advocate Shams Perwez Khan

Advocate Shams Perwez Khan

Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Family

Get Advice
Advocate Murali Krishnan

Advocate Murali Krishnan

Anticipatory Bail,Arbitration,Bankruptcy & Insolvency,Cheque Bounce,Child Custody,Civil,Consumer Court,Customs & Central Excise,Criminal,Divorce,Domestic Violence,Family,High Court,Labour & Service,Landlord & Tenant,Media and Entertainment,Medical Negligence,Muslim Law,Succession Certificate,Supreme Court

Get Advice
Advocate Dulesingh

Advocate Dulesingh

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Civil, Consumer Court, Child Custody, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, Immigration, Insurance, International Law, Labour & Service, High Court, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, NCLT, Property, Startup, R.T.I, Patent, Recovery, RERA, Succession Certificate, Tax, Trademark & Copyright, Revenue, Wills Trusts, Supreme Court

Get Advice
Advocate Advocate Rekibur Rahman

Advocate Advocate Rekibur Rahman

Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Civil, Consumer Court, Criminal

Get Advice
Advocate Vinay Gupta

Advocate Vinay Gupta

Court Marriage, Criminal, Divorce, Family, Insurance, Motor Accident, Recovery, Cheque Bounce, Consumer Court

Get Advice
Advocate Vijender Kumar Bhardwaj

Advocate Vijender Kumar Bhardwaj

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Immigration, Insurance, International Law, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, NCLT, Patent, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, RERA, Startup, Succession Certificate, Tax, Wills Trusts, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Tejas Kapoor

Advocate Tejas Kapoor

Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Divorce, Consumer Court

Get Advice

Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.