In criminal proceedings, the fact that the accused has a bad character is irrelevant, unless evidence has been given that he has a good character, in which case it becomes relevant.
Explanation 1.—This section does not apply to cases in which the bad character of any person is itself a fact in issue.
Explanation 2.—A previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.
Section 49 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, establishes that in criminal proceedings, the accused's bad character is generally considered irrelevant. However, if there is evidence presented regarding the accused's good character, then their bad character becomes relevant. Additionally, previous convictions can be presented as evidence of bad character, but this section does not apply when bad character is a key fact in issue.
A: The bad character of an accused becomes relevant only if evidence of good character has been presented.
A: No, this section does not apply in cases where bad character itself is a fact in issue.
A: Yes, a previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.
1. Scenario 1: If an accused presents witnesses to testify about their good character, the prosecution can then introduce evidence of the accused's previous bad character.
2. Scenario 2: In a case where the accused's character is not in dispute, evidence of a past conviction may be used to suggest a pattern of behavior.
Section 49 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 clarifies that an accused's bad character is not relevant in criminal proceedings unless good character evidence is introduced. It also notes that previous convictions can be relevant as evidence of bad character, while excluding cases where bad character is already a matter of contention.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
