- 04-Nov-2025
- Marriage and Divorce Laws
In international arbitration, the allocation of costs is an important and sometimes contentious issue. Arbitration involves various costs, including administrative fees, arbitrator fees, legal fees, expert fees, and hearing-related costs. The responsibility for bearing these costs can significantly affect the parties involved in the dispute. Typically, the costs of arbitration are shared between the parties, but the tribunal has the discretion to allocate them as it sees fit, based on the circumstances of the case. Understanding how costs are allocated helps parties anticipate the financial implications of arbitration.
The general rule in international arbitration is that the losing party will bear the costs of the arbitration. However, this is not an absolute rule, and the tribunal has significant discretion in deciding how costs should be allocated.
Arbitration costs typically include:
These costs are usually divided between the parties in a way that reflects the outcome of the case.
While the losing party often bears the costs, the tribunal has the discretion to determine how costs should be shared. This decision can be influenced by factors such as the conduct of the parties during the arbitration, the complexity of the case, and the extent to which each party has succeeded or failed in their claims.
Example: In a construction dispute where both parties make claims and counterclaims, if the tribunal finds that the claimant succeeded on the majority of claims but failed on a few others, the tribunal might allocate 70% of the costs to the losing party and 30% to the winning party.
If a party succeeds only partially, the tribunal may adjust the allocation of costs to reflect the degree of success. Sometimes, if the case is settled before the final hearing, the parties may agree to bear their own costs or divide them in a way that is mutually agreed upon.
Example: If one party wins 80% of its claims, the tribunal might award 80% of the costs of the arbitration to the winning party and 20% to the losing party.
The loser pays rule is commonly followed, where the losing party is required to pay all or a portion of the costs incurred by the winning party. However, this rule is flexible, and the tribunal may adjust cost allocation depending on the circumstances of the case.
Tribunals may take into account the behavior of the parties during the arbitration, such as whether they cooperated with procedural deadlines or engaged in bad faith conduct. Unreasonable or delaying tactics can result in the tribunal allocating a larger share of the costs to the offending party.
Example: In an arbitration involving a shareholder dispute, if the tribunal finds that one party deliberately prolonged the proceedings without just cause, that party may be ordered to bear the costs of the arbitration, even if they are the prevailing party on the main issue.
Parties may agree at the outset of the arbitration to share the costs equally, regardless of the outcome. This can happen in certain types of disputes or where both parties seek a neutral and efficient process, such as in partnership or joint venture disagreements.
Some arbitral institutions (like the ICC or LCIA) have specific rules on how costs should be allocated, but these still allow the tribunal some flexibility in its decision. For instance, under the LCIA rules, the tribunal has the discretion to allocate costs based on a party’s success or failure in the case.
Legal fees are typically not awarded as part of the arbitration costs unless there is a specific agreement or provision for such awards in the arbitration agreement. The tribunal may, however, take into account the legal fees when allocating costs.
The fees for the arbitrators are typically borne by the parties, with the tribunal determining the proportion to be paid by each party. This may depend on the tribunal's assessment of the overall success of the parties.
Fees charged by the arbitral institution for administrative support and services (e.g., scheduling, handling communications) are generally allocated based on the overall outcome of the case.
Many arbitral institutions offer expedited arbitration procedures for certain types of cases (e.g., lower-value disputes or simpler matters). These procedures often reduce the overall cost by limiting the number of hearings and the scope of document production.
For less complex cases, parties may agree to use a sole arbitrator rather than a three-member panel, which can reduce costs.
The tribunal may assess whether a party’s behavior caused unnecessary delays or incurred unnecessary costs. In such cases, the tribunal may decide that the party at fault should bear more costs.
The amount of success or failure each party has in relation to the claims and defenses can influence cost allocation. The more successful a party is, the more likely they are to have their costs covered.
The specific rules of the arbitral institution can also impact how costs are allocated. Institutions like the ICC or LCIA have clear guidelines on cost allocation, but ultimately, the tribunal retains discretion.
In disputes involving multiple parties, complicated technical issues, or voluminous evidence, the allocation of costs may be more nuanced. The tribunal may take into account the number of hearings or the extensive use of experts.
GlobalTech Inc. (claimant) and BuildCo Ltd. (respondent) are involved in an arbitration regarding a construction contract. The arbitration costs are as follows:
After a lengthy hearing, the tribunal finds that BuildCo Ltd. is primarily responsible for the delay in construction and awards GlobalTech Inc. $1.5 million in damages. The tribunal allocates the costs as follows:
In this case, BuildCo Ltd. bears a substantial portion of the arbitration costs due to its failure to meet its contractual obligations.
The costs of arbitration are generally shared between the parties, but the tribunal has the discretion to allocate these costs based on factors such as the parties' success, the behavior of the parties during the arbitration, and the complexity of the case. The loser pays principle is widely followed, but tribunals can decide that both parties share costs in cases of partial success or misconduct. Cost allocation is an important consideration for parties involved in arbitration, and understanding how costs will be distributed can help manage expectations and costs during the process.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
