- 15-Oct-2025
- public international law
Third-party funding refers to financial support provided by an external party (not directly involved in the legal dispute) to a litigant, usually to cover legal costs and expenses. While this practice is commonplace in many jurisdictions, its legality and regulation vary across countries. In India, the concept of third-party funding has garnered attention in recent years, particularly in the context of commercial disputes and arbitration. However, the practice remains under scrutiny and is governed by specific regulations that aim to balance accessibility to justice with the need to prevent abuse.
The concept of third-party funding is not explicitly prohibited by Indian law. However, the Indian legal system has traditionally been conservative when it comes to external financial support in litigation. The Indian Contract Act, 1872, does not expressly deal with third-party funding, which means that the practice is not clearly defined in Indian statutes.
The Supreme Court of India has shown a more open approach towards third-party funding in recent years, particularly in the context of arbitration proceedings. In the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Amritsar Gas Service (1991), the Court expressed its approval of third-party funding in certain circumstances. The Law Commission of India in its report on commercial courts (2015) also recommended allowing third-party funding in legal proceedings to make justice more accessible, especially for those with limited financial resources.
Third-party funding is more common in arbitration and commercial disputes rather than in traditional litigation. International arbitration institutions, like the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and the International Court of Arbitration (ICC), allow third-party funding. Indian arbitration laws, especially under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, are also evolving to incorporate mechanisms for third-party funding, especially given the growing importance of arbitration in resolving commercial disputes.
While third-party funding is allowed to some extent, there are legal restrictions to ensure that the funding does not interfere with the independence of the judicial process. For example:
Imagine a small business in India, ABC Enterprises, is involved in a long-running dispute over an intellectual property infringement case with a larger corporation. The costs of litigation are too high for ABC Enterprises, and they are unable to continue without external funding. A third-party financier, who specializes in litigation funding, agrees to cover the legal fees in exchange for a percentage of any compensation or settlement that ABC Enterprises might receive if they win the case. This type of funding enables ABC Enterprises to pursue the case without worrying about the immediate financial burden, potentially leading to a successful outcome.
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.