- 15-Oct-2025
- public international law
Arbitration is a widely used method of dispute resolution, where parties agree to submit their disputes to an impartial third party (the arbitral tribunal). While arbitral awards are generally final and binding, there are limited circumstances under which a party can challenge or appeal an award. These challenges often revolve around procedural errors, issues of fairness, or violations of public policy. The ability to appeal against an arbitral award is governed by national and international arbitration laws, and the grounds for appeal are typically narrow compared to those in traditional court proceedings.
If the arbitral tribunal acted outside the scope of the agreement or lacked jurisdiction to hear the dispute, the award can be challenged.
A party can challenge an arbitral award if there were significant procedural irregularities, such as failure to give proper notice or bias in the selection of the arbitrators.
A party may appeal the award if it violates the fundamental principles of public policy or contravenes laws that are considered essential to the legal system of the jurisdiction.
If the arbitral tribunal exceeds its powers or fails to make a decision on the issues it was asked to resolve, the award can be contested.
If the arbitration agreement itself is found to be invalid, an award based on such an agreement may be challenged.
If an arbitrator fails to disclose a conflict of interest that could have impacted the impartiality of the process, the award may be subject to challenge.
Under laws like the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (India) or similar local statutes, a party can seek to have an arbitral award set aside through a judicial process. The court will only intervene on very specific grounds such as those mentioned above.
Internationally, the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards allows limited grounds for challenging awards, focusing mainly on jurisdictional issues, fairness, and public policy concerns.
If one party claims they were not notified of the arbitration proceedings or were unable to participate, the award may be contested.
If the tribunal does not adhere to the terms of the arbitration agreement, the award may be challenged on this ground.
Some jurisdictions allow challenges if the tribunal applied the wrong legal principles or misinterpreted the law.
Most jurisdictions set a time limit (typically 3 months) for filing a challenge to an arbitral award. Failing to meet this deadline may prevent an appeal.
Courts generally have limited powers when it comes to reviewing arbitral awards, focusing mainly on procedural fairness and jurisdictional issues.
In certain cases, after an award has been set aside, the party may appeal to a higher court, but only on very specific grounds like public policy violations.
Ensure that the arbitration agreement is clear and comprehensive, addressing possible challenges and ensuring that both parties agree to binding arbitration.
Choosing experienced and impartial arbitrators can minimize the risk of an award being challenged later.
Familiarize yourself with the legal framework for arbitration in your jurisdiction to understand when and how an award can be appealed.
If you believe an arbitral award is flawed, act quickly, as the window for challenging or appealing is often limited.
Suppose a company named XYZ Inc. is involved in an international arbitration with a supplier (ABC Ltd.). After the tribunal awards damages in favor of ABC Ltd., XYZ Inc. believes the arbitrators were biased due to a conflict of interest that was not disclosed.
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.