- 21-Dec-2024
- Family Law Guides
The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.
(a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B's father. If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession. Therefore, the burden of proof is on A.
(b) A sues B for money due on a bond. The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved. Therefore, the burden of proof is on B.
Section 105 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, specifies that the burden of proof in legal proceedings falls on the party that would lose if no evidence were presented. This section is crucial for determining who is responsible for proving their claims or defenses in court. The accompanying illustrations demonstrate how this principle applies in different scenarios, clarifying which party must provide evidence to support their position.
It states that the burden of proof lies on the person who would fail if no evidence is presented by either side.
It is determined by identifying which party would lose if no evidence were provided.
A sues B for land possession, asserting it was left to him by a will. If no evidence is presented, B retains possession, so the burden of proof is on A.
A sues B for money due on a bond, where B claims fraud. If no evidence is provided, A would succeed because the bond is not disputed, so the burden of proof is on B.
It determines which party must present evidence to support their claims, ensuring that the case is fairly adjudicated based on substantiated facts.
If A claims ownership of a piece of property that B currently possesses, A must provide evidence supporting his claim. If he fails to do so, B retains possession.
In a case where A sues B over a loan agreement but B alleges that the agreement was obtained through fraud, B must prove the fraud if no other evidence is presented.
Section 105 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, clarifies the principle of burden of proof in legal proceedings. It places the onus on the party that would lose if no evidence is provided, guiding the court in determining which side must substantiate its claims. The illustrations serve to elucidate this concept through practical examples, reinforcing the significance of providing evidence in legal disputes.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
