- 21-Dec-2024
- Family Law Guides
No such question as is referred to in section 151 ought to be asked, unless the person asking it has reasonable grounds for thinking that the imputation which it conveys is well-founded.
(a) An advocate is instructed by another advocate that an important witness is a dacoit. This is a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a dacoit.
(b) An advocate is informed by a person in Court that an important witness is a dacoit. The informant, on being questioned by the advocate, gives satisfactory reasons for his statement. This is a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a dacoit.
(c) A witness, of whom nothing whatever is known, is asked at random whether he is a dacoit. There are here no reasonable grounds for the question.
(d) A witness, of whom nothing whatever is known, being questioned as to his mode of life and means of living, gives unsatisfactory answers. This may be a reasonable ground for asking him if he is a dacoit.
Section 152 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 stipulates that questions referred to in section 151 cannot be posed without reasonable grounds for believing that the imputation conveyed by the question is justified. The section includes illustrations to clarify what constitutes reasonable grounds for asking such questions.
Section 152 states that questions regarding a witness's credibility must be based on reasonable grounds to believe that the imputation is well-founded.
The person asking the question must have reasonable grounds for thinking that the imputation conveyed is justified.
Yes, if an advocate is informed by another advocate that a witness is a dacoit, that serves as a reasonable ground for asking the witness about it.
Asking a witness, of whom nothing is known, whether he is a dacoit at random is an example of an unreasonable question.
If the witness provides unsatisfactory answers about his mode of life, that could be a reasonable ground for further questioning.
An advocate receives credible information from a reliable source that a witness is involved in criminal activity. This justifies the advocate asking the witness about his character.
Conversely, if an advocate randomly questions a stranger in court about being a dacoit without any prior knowledge or information, that would not be justified.
Section 152 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 emphasizes the necessity for reasonable grounds when questioning a witness about serious allegations. The section aims to protect individuals from baseless accusations while allowing for credible inquiries based on reliable information.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
