Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence.
BNS Section 54 states that if a person who would otherwise be liable to be punished as an abettor is present at the time an offence is committed, they are considered to have committed the offence themselves.
Q: What does BNS Section 54 address?
A: BNS Section 54 addresses the situation where a person, who would be liable as an abettor if absent, is present when the offence is committed. In such cases, the person is deemed to have committed the offence.
Q: What is the implication for someone present during the commission of an offence under BNS Section 54?
A: The implication is that if a person who would have been held liable as an abettor is present when the offence is committed, they are treated as having committed the offence directly.
1. Example 1: If Person A would be punished as an abettor for a crime but is present when the crime is committed, Person A is considered to have committed the crime themselves.
2. Example 2: Suppose Person B is not just encouraging but actually present when a theft occurs, despite being an abettor by their usual role. Under BNS Section 54, Person B is deemed to have committed the theft.
BNS Section 54 establishes that if an individual who would be held accountable as an abettor is present during the commission of the crime, they are regarded as having committed the crime themselves.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
