Law4u - Made in India

Can marketplaces be sued for unfair trade practices under Competition Act provisions?

Answer By law4u team

The Competition Act of 2002 in India, along with similar laws in other countries, was established to prevent anti-competitive behavior and unfair trade practices in the market. Online marketplaces, which connect buyers and sellers on a digital platform, can face legal consequences under the Competition Act if they engage in practices that harm fair competition or exploit their market position unfairly. The law aims to promote a competitive marketplace, encourage innovation, and protect consumer interests by prohibiting actions that distort competition.

When Can Marketplaces Be Sued for Unfair Trade Practices Under the Competition Act?

Abuse of Dominance:

If a marketplace holds a dominant position in the market and abuses that dominance, it can be sued under the Competition Act. This includes actions that harm competition by exploiting power in an unfair manner, like price manipulation, restricting market access, or limiting consumer choices.

Example of Abuse of Dominance: If a dominant online marketplace imposes exclusive arrangements with sellers to block competitors or forces sellers to offer products at lower prices than they would otherwise, this could be considered an abuse of dominance.

Provisions Under the Competition Act (Section 4):

  • This section defines dominant position as when a company controls a substantial portion of the market and can act independently of competitors or consumers.
  • Abuse of such a position, such as through predatory pricing (selling at a loss to drive out competition) or price fixing, can result in penalties.

Anti-competitive Agreements (Price Fixing, Cartels):

Marketplaces can also face penalties if they engage in anti-competitive agreements or cartel-like behavior. This includes colluding with sellers to fix prices, allocate markets, or engage in other practices that restrict competition.

Example of Price Fixing: If a marketplace colludes with its third-party sellers to set a minimum price for a product, rather than allowing market forces to determine the price, it can be seen as a violation of the Competition Act.

Provisions Under the Competition Act (Section 3):

  • The Act prohibits any agreement or concerted practice that may harm competition in India, such as collusive behavior between market players (e.g., sellers or platforms) to manipulate prices or divide territories.

Unfair Advantage to Certain Sellers:

If a marketplace gives unfair advantages to certain sellers over others, such as promoting specific products or services to the detriment of other sellers, this could be seen as an unfair trade practice under the Competition Act.

Example of Unfair Advantage: If an e-commerce marketplace promotes its own brand or products over third-party seller listings, even if those third-party sellers offer better prices or quality, it could create an unfair competitive advantage for the marketplace’s own offerings, which may violate competition laws.

Provisions Under the Competition Act (Section 4):

  • This provision also prohibits unfair methods of competition that distort market forces, such as preferential treatment given to specific sellers on the platform.

Predatory Pricing:

Predatory pricing refers to when a marketplace sells goods at an unprofitably low price to drive competitors out of the market, only to raise prices once competition has been eliminated.

Example of Predatory Pricing: A marketplace offers a product at a deep discount or below cost to attract customers, and later raises prices once smaller competitors are driven out of the market.

Provisions Under the Competition Act (Section 4):

  • Selling below cost to harm competition can lead to charges of predatory pricing, which is considered an abuse of a dominant market position and a violation of fair trade practices.

Restricting Market Access or Consumer Choice:

Marketplaces may be accused of restricting market access for certain sellers or preventing consumers from accessing the best deals by unfairly limiting or controlling listings.

Example of Market Access Restrictions: If a platform imposes unreasonable fees or restrictions that prevent smaller businesses or new entrants from listing their products, this could be considered a restrictive trade practice.

Provisions Under the Competition Act (Section 3):

  • Any action that limits market access for other players or creates a barrier to entry can lead to a claim under the Competition Act.

How the Competition Act Helps Ensure Fair Competition and Protect Consumers:

Promoting Free and Fair Market Practices:

The Competition Act encourages fair market competition by prohibiting practices that limit competition, such as price fixing, market manipulation, and predatory behavior. It ensures that consumers benefit from competitive pricing, product innovation, and a wide range of choices in the marketplace.

Consumer Protection:

By prohibiting unfair trade practices, the law helps protect consumers from monopolistic pricing, false advertising, and deceptive practices that could exploit their lack of bargaining power. It ensures that marketplaces do not take advantage of consumers by using unfair competitive strategies.

Encouraging Innovation and Product Diversity:

By preventing anti-competitive practices, the Competition Act ensures that businesses compete on equal terms, driving innovation and product diversity. Consumers benefit from a variety of options, better prices, and improved quality, as businesses are incentivized to offer better products and services.

Monitoring Mergers and Acquisitions:

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) monitors any mergers or acquisitions in the e-commerce sector to ensure that they do not lead to a reduction in competition or the creation of monopolies. If a marketplace’s acquisition of a competitor would reduce competition, it can be challenged under the Competition Act.

How Marketplaces Can Mitigate Risk of Legal Action:

Fair Pricing and Listing Practices:

Marketplaces should avoid any price-fixing agreements with sellers and ensure that pricing is determined by market forces. This includes providing sellers with fair access to the platform and transparent fees and commission structures.

Non-Discriminatory Treatment:

Ensure that all sellers, regardless of size, receive equal treatment on the platform. This includes fair representation in product search results, advertising, and promotions.

Regular Compliance Audits:

Marketplaces should conduct regular compliance audits to assess whether their practices align with the Competition Act and other relevant laws. This can help identify potential risks and take corrective actions before they lead to legal issues.

Transparency and Consumer Rights:

Marketplaces should be transparent with both sellers and consumers about their policies and practices. Providing clear information about pricing, promotions, and terms of service helps reduce the risk of misunderstandings and disputes.

Example:

A major e-commerce platform in India lists products from various third-party sellers, but it starts offering its own private label products at discounted rates that are below cost. This significantly reduces the sales of other sellers on the platform, leading to some sellers filing complaints with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) about predatory pricing and unfair competition.

Steps the CCI could take:

  • Investigation: The CCI would investigate whether the marketplace’s pricing strategy constitutes predatory pricing or unfair competition.
  • Corrective Measures: If found guilty, the marketplace could be required to adjust its pricing or modify its selling practices to restore fair competition.
  • Penalties: The platform may face fines or other penalties if found to have violated the provisions of the Competition Act.

Conclusion:

Online marketplaces can indeed be sued for engaging in unfair trade practices under the Competition Act if they abuse their market dominance, engage in anti-competitive agreements, or employ predatory pricing strategies that harm consumers and competition. The law helps ensure that marketplaces compete fairly, promote innovation, and protect consumer interests by prohibiting actions that distort free market competition. Marketplaces should adopt fair practices, be transparent, and comply with regulatory guidelines to avoid legal issues under the Competition Act.

Our Verified Advocates

Get expert legal advice instantly.

Advocate Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary

Advocate Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary

Civil, Cheque Bounce, Landlord & Tenant, Documentation, Family, Recovery, Property

Get Advice
Advocate Mithilesh Kumar

Advocate Mithilesh Kumar

Criminal, Anticipatory Bail, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Court Marriage, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Family, Domestic Violence, Revenue, Succession Certificate

Get Advice
Advocate Ajay Pratap Singh Yadav

Advocate Ajay Pratap Singh Yadav

Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Motor Accident, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Beena Singh

Advocate Beena Singh

Anticipatory Bail, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Criminal, Divorce, Documentation, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Arbitration, Cyber Crime, Landlord & Tenant, Property, RERA, NCLT, Recovery, Succession Certificate

Get Advice
Advocate Naresh Moun

Advocate Naresh Moun

R.T.I, Criminal, Court Marriage, Divorce, Family, Domestic Violence, Motor Accident, Arbitration, Cheque Bounce, Anticipatory Bail, Consumer Court, Property, Insurance

Get Advice
Advocate Smt Sajjan Bairwa

Advocate Smt Sajjan Bairwa

Motor Accident, Civil, Cheque Bounce, Criminal, Divorce, Family

Get Advice
Advocate Pramod Kumar

Advocate Pramod Kumar

Anticipatory Bail, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Breach of Contract, Child Custody, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Immigration, International Law, Cheque Bounce, Customs & Central Excise, Civil, Banking & Finance, Medical Negligence, Recovery, RERA, Supreme Court

Get Advice
Advocate Sp Kiran Raj

Advocate Sp Kiran Raj

Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, High Court, Family, Divorce, Documentation, Domestic Violence, Tax, GST, Supreme Court, Succession Certificate, Cyber Crime, Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Arbitration, Breach of Contract, Child Custody, Civil

Get Advice

ECommerce Law Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about ECommerce Law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.