Why did the Andhra Pradesh High Court refuse to halt the ticket price hike for 'Pushpa-2'?

    General
Law4u App Download
  1. Petitioner's Arguments:
    • A PIL filed by S. Venkateswarlu claimed that the government violated GO 13 by allowing six daily shows instead of the permissible five.
    • The petitioner argued that ticket price hikes for 12 days exceeded the 10-day limit set by the court.
    • Concerns were raised about premier shows charging excessively high prices.
  2. Court's Observations:
    • The court stated that price increases within prescribed norms are acceptable.
    • It remarked that individuals unable to afford premier shows should avoid attending them.
    • The bench emphasized prioritizing larger public interest issues over such matters.
  3. Direction to Government:
    • The government was advised to adhere to the court's previous orders, limiting price hikes to 10 days and shows to regulatory limits.
  4. Outcome:
    • The court refused to grant immediate relief but promised detailed orders later.

This decision highlights the court's focus on balancing regulatory compliance with practical concerns about public interests.

Answer By Law4u Team

General Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about General. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.

Get all the information you want in one app! Download Now