- 19-Apr-2025
- Healthcare and Medical Malpractice
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part.
{1}32A. [Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32.]
Omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).
{2}33. Power of Parliament to modify the rights conferred by this Part in their application to Forces, etc.
Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to:
1. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 6 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
2. Subs. by the Constitution (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984, s. 2, for art. 33 (w.e.f. 11-9-1984).
Article 32 guarantees the right to approach the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs for safeguarding these rights. This article acts as a crucial mechanism for protecting citizens from violations of their Fundamental Rights.
It ensures that citizens can directly approach the Supreme Court to enforce their Fundamental Rights, making it a guardian of these rights.
The Supreme Court can issue writs like Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto to enforce Fundamental Rights.
If a person is unlawfully detained, they can file a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 32 in the Supreme Court to seek release.
Article 32 provides a constitutional remedy for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights by allowing individuals to directly approach the Supreme Court. It ensures judicial protection against violations of these rights.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about The Constitution of India. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.