In cheque bounce cases, jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to hear and decide the matter. Under Indian law, particularly the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the jurisdiction for filing a case related to a bounced cheque is determined by certain factors, which include the place of the dishonour of the cheque, the banking location, and the place where the cause of action arises. Key Points Regarding Jurisdiction in Cheque Bounce Cases: 1. Place of Dishonour (Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act): As per Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a cheque bounce case can be filed in a court within whose jurisdiction the cheque is dishonoured. The place of dishonour is typically where the bank where the cheque was presented for payment is located. This is usually the location of the bank branch where the cheque is returned or dishonoured. 2. Place of Payment of the Cheque: In some cases, the place of payment of the cheque can also be a relevant factor in deciding jurisdiction. If the cheque is issued and presented in a place that is different from the bank’s location, the court in the location where the cheque is presented for payment may also have jurisdiction. 3. Place of Issuance: Another possible jurisdictional point is where the cheque was issued. If the cheque is issued from a specific city or place, the court in that jurisdiction might also have authority to hear the case. 4. Cause of Action (Section 142): The cause of action in a cheque bounce case typically arises when the cheque is returned as unpaid (dishonoured), and the payee is notified of the dishonour. The cause of action could also be viewed as arising at the place where the notice of dishonour is issued or where the demand for payment is made. If the notice is issued from a particular location, that location may be relevant in determining the court’s jurisdiction. 5. Court's Authority (Magistrate's Court): Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the cheque bounce case can only be filed in a Magistrate's Court. The Magistrate’s Court must have territorial jurisdiction over the area where the cheque was dishonoured or where the cause of action arose. The case must be filed in a Magistrate's Court located in the jurisdiction of the dishonour or where the cheque was issued, or where the demand notice was sent. 6. Jurisdiction in Case of Multiple Locations: If the cheque was issued, presented, and dishonoured in different locations, the jurisdiction may be considered in any of those locations. Courts may also consider where the demand notice for payment was sent or the legal notice of the dishonour was issued to the drawer. 7. Transfer of Case: If the cheque bounce case is filed in a court that does not have proper jurisdiction, the case can be transferred to the appropriate court with the correct jurisdiction. The concerned court may transfer the case if requested by either party, or it may be ordered by a higher court if there are grounds for transfer. Conclusion: Jurisdiction in cheque bounce cases is primarily determined by the place where the cheque was dishonoured or the place where the cause of action arises, including the location of the bank and the place where the demand notice was issued. As per the Negotiable Instruments Act, the case is generally filed in a Magistrate's Court within the jurisdiction where these events occurred. In cases involving multiple locations, the jurisdiction may be determined based on any of these places.