Answer By law4u team
The difference between a product patent and a process patent lies in what is being protected: a product (the end result) or a process (the method of making it). Both types are recognized under Indian patent law, but they serve different purposes. Here is a clear and simple explanation in text format: 1. Product Patent A product patent protects the actual invention — the final product itself. If someone else makes, sells, or uses the same product (even by using a different method), they would be infringing the patent. It gives stronger protection because it covers the end result regardless of how it’s made. Example: If you invent a new type of medicine (a chemical compound), and it is patented as a product, no one else can make or sell that medicine, even if they develop a different method to make it. 2. Process Patent A process patent protects the method or technique used to create a product. Others can make the same product using a different process without infringing the patent. It gives narrower protection, limited to the specific method claimed in the patent. Example: If you invent a new way to make a textile, and you get a process patent, others may legally make the same textile using a different manufacturing method, unless that method is also patented. Key Differences in Simple Terms Product Patent: Protects what you make. Process Patent: Protects how you make it. Legal Position in India India originally followed a process patent system (especially for pharmaceuticals and food) to encourage access to affordable products. But after the TRIPS Agreement and the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, India now allows both product and process patents, including for pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Conclusion A product patent gives wider protection and is harder to work around. A process patent gives limited protection and can be bypassed by using a different method. Which one to apply for depends on the nature of your invention and your strategic goal.