Law4u - Made in India

What is patent revocation?

03-Jan-2026
Patent

Answer By law4u team

What is Patent Revocation? Patent revocation is the legal process by which a granted patent is cancelled or invalidated. This can occur when the patent is challenged by a third party or when the patent office, on its own initiative, determines that the patent was granted incorrectly or does not meet the requirements set out by law. Revocation of a patent effectively nullifies the protection granted by the patent, meaning the invention is no longer protected by intellectual property rights. In India, patent revocation is governed under the Patents Act, 1970, which lays out the grounds and procedures for revoking a patent. A patent can be revoked either by the patent office or by a court after a petition or challenge is made. Grounds for Patent Revocation in India The grounds for patent revocation are outlined in Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970. A patent can be revoked on the following grounds: 1. Lack of Novelty or Inventive Step A patent can be revoked if it is found that the invention: Is not novel (i.e., it is not new and has been disclosed to the public before the filing date). Does not involve an inventive step (i.e., the invention is obvious to someone skilled in the field based on prior art). This is one of the most common grounds for revocation. If it is proved that the invention was already known, or a similar invention already existed, the patent can be revoked. 2. Prior Publication A patent can be revoked if: The invention was already published in any form before the filing date of the patent application. The patent was anticipated by earlier disclosures or publications in the public domain, such as books, journal articles, or patents. 3. Non-Disclosure of Information A patent can be revoked if the patent applicant intentionally failed to disclose relevant prior art or other information that could affect the patent's validity. This is known as a failure of duty of disclosure. If it is established that an inventor misrepresented or failed to disclose material facts, the patent can be revoked. 4. Patentability Requirements Not Met A patent may be revoked if: The invention is not considered a patentable invention as per Indian law (for example, if it relates to certain exclusions, such as abstract ideas, scientific principles, mathematical methods, or business methods). The invention does not meet the requirements of Section 3 (such as inventions related to atomic energy) or Section 4 of the Patents Act. 5. Incomplete or Insufficient Disclosure If the patent specification (the written description of the invention) does not adequately disclose the invention or does not provide enough detail to allow someone skilled in the art to reproduce the invention, the patent may be revoked. 6. Non-Working of the Patent A patent can be revoked if the invention is not being worked in India. The Patents Act, 1970 requires that a patented invention must be used in India, and if it is not being commercially exploited in the country for a certain period (typically 3 years from the date of grant), it can be challenged and revoked. 7. Fraudulent or Misleading Claims A patent can be revoked if it was granted based on fraudulent or misleading information. If the applicant was found to have made false claims or intentionally misled the patent office, the patent may be revoked. Who Can File a Petition for Patent Revocation? Any person can file a petition for the revocation of a patent. This includes: 1. Any Interested Person An interested person can file a revocation petition before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) or the Patent Office. An interested person can include a competitor, a third party, or even the government, who believes that the patent should not have been granted. 2. Government of India The Central Government can also file a petition for the revocation of a patent, especially if it believes the patent is against public interest or violates public policy. 3. Competitors Competitors in the same industry can challenge a patent if they believe the granted patent obstructs their ability to practice or commercialize their inventions. Procedure for Revocation of Patent 1. Filing a Revocation Petition To initiate the revocation process, the petition for revocation must be filed before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) or the Patent Office. The petition should detail the grounds for revocation, such as lack of novelty, inventive step, or inadequate disclosure. 2. Grounds and Evidence The petitioner must provide solid evidence to support their claim for revocation. The grounds for revocation must be clearly stated, along with the evidence or facts that prove the patent should not have been granted. The petitioner must also disclose relevant prior art, research, or documents supporting the claim. 3. Examination and Hearing Once the petition is filed, the Patent Office or IPAB will examine the grounds and evidence. The patent holder will be given an opportunity to respond to the allegations, and hearings may be scheduled if necessary. The parties involved will present their arguments. 4. Decision on Revocation After the examination, the IPAB or the Patent Office will issue a ruling. If the patent is found to be invalid based on the grounds presented, it will be revoked. The decision can be appealed in higher courts if the patent holder or the petitioner is dissatisfied with the outcome. Effect of Patent Revocation Once a patent is revoked, the patentee loses the exclusive rights to the invention. This means: No protection: The invention is no longer protected under intellectual property laws. Competitors can use the technology: Others can now legally produce, use, or sell the invention without facing legal consequences. Legal action is terminated: Any infringement lawsuits that the patent holder had initiated will be dismissed. Defenses to Patent Revocation A patent holder may defend the revocation by presenting one or more of the following defenses: 1. Novelty and Inventive Step The patentee can demonstrate that the invention is indeed novel and involves an inventive step. This could be done by providing more substantial evidence of how the invention differs from prior art. 2. Disclosure and Specification The patent holder can prove that the patent specification is complete and satisfies all the legal requirements of the Patents Act. 3. Working of the Patent The patent holder can argue that the patent is being commercially exploited or worked in India, and hence, should not be revoked on the grounds of non-working. Patent Revocation vs. Patent Opposition It's important to note the distinction between patent revocation and patent opposition: Patent Opposition: This is a process that takes place before the grant of a patent. A person can file an opposition if they believe the patent should not be granted based on the grounds mentioned above. This is done during the pre-grant or post-grant opposition stage. Patent Revocation: Revocation occurs after the patent has been granted. It is a legal action taken to invalidate the patent if it is found to be improperly granted. Conclusion Patent revocation is a legal remedy available to invalidate a patent that does not meet the criteria for patentability, such as novelty, inventive step, or full disclosure. It can be initiated by any interested party, including competitors, the government, or any other person who believes that a patent was granted incorrectly. The procedure for revocation involves filing a petition with the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), which will review the case and determine whether the patent should be cancelled or upheld. Patent revocation serves as an important safeguard to ensure that patents are granted only for legitimate, novel, and non-obvious inventions, maintaining the integrity of the patent system.

Answer By Ayantika Mondal

Dear client, The answer to your question is stated as, patent revocation refers to the legal cancellation of a granted patent, whereby the patent is rendered void and unenforceable, as if it had never been granted. Under the Patents Act, 1970, a patent may be revoked when it is found that the grant does not comply with the statutory requirements or where the patentee has failed to fulfil legal obligations. As per Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970, any person interested or the Central Government may file a petition before the High Court now the jurisdiction lies with the High Courts pursuant to the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 for revocation of a patent on specified grounds. These grounds include, inter alia, lack of novelty or inventive step, non-patentable subject matter under Sections 3 and 4, insufficiency of disclosure, wrongful obtaining of the invention, prior publication or prior use, and failure to comply with the requirements of the Act. In addition, Section 65 provides for revocation where the patent relates to an invention prejudicial to the defence of India, while Section 66 empowers the Central Government to revoke a patent in public interest. Further, under Section 85, a patent may also be revoked for non-working of the invention in India, upon an application by any interested person after the grant of a compulsory licence. Thus, patent revocation is a statutory remedy provided under Sections 64, 65, 66 and 85 of the Patents Act, 1970, ensuring that only valid, lawful and socially beneficial inventions continue to enjoy patent protection. I hope this answer was helpful. For further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you.

Answer By Anik

Dear client, As per query, patent revocation refers to the legal process through which a granted patent is declared to be invalid and cancelled, thereby extinguishing the exclusive rights conferred upon the patentee. This mechanism which exists to ensure that the patent protection is granted only to the inventions that genuinely satisfy the statutory requirements of patentability, such as the novelty, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure. Revocation may occur where the patent was wrongly granted, obtained through some fraud or misrepresentation, or where its continued by the enforcement is contrary to public interest. Purpose of the Patent Revocation The primary objective of patent revocation is to correct the errors in the patent granting process and safeguarding the public interest. It ensures that the monopolies are not unjustly conferred over inventions that do not meet the legal standards, thereby maintaining the integrity of the patent system. By allowing invalid patents to be challenged, revocation also promotes fair competition and prevents abuse of patent rights. Grounds for Revocation A patent may be revoked on several grounds, which includes the lack of novelty, obviousness or absence of the inventive step, insufficient or unclear disclosure of the invention, and some fraudulent acquisition of the patent. In certain jurisdictions, including that of India, revocation may also be sought where the invention is not only worked within the country or where reasonable public requirements are not met, such as the excessive pricing or non-availability of the patented product. Who May Initiate Revocation Proceedings Revocation proceedings may be initiated by any of the person having a legitimate interest in the matter, such as the competitor or the affected party. Additionally, the Central Government is also empowered to seek revocation where the patent is the prejudicial to public interest, national security, or public health. Procedure for Patent Revocation In India, a petition for the revocation may also be filed before the appropriate forum, such as the High Court or the Intellectual Property Division, depending on the circumstances. The process involves pleadings, submission of evidence, and legal arguments by both the parties, culminating in a judicial determination on the validity of the patent. Outcome of Revocation Proceedings Upon adjudication, the authority may also revoke the patent entirely, invalidate some specific claims while as well allowing others to stand, or to even permit the patentee to amend the patent to rectify the defects. The outcome depends on the nature and gravity of the defects established during the proceedings. I hope this answer was helpful. For further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you.

Patent Verified Advocates

Get expert legal advice instantly.

Advocate Sundar Singh Tomar

Advocate Sundar Singh Tomar

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Immigration, Insurance, International Law, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, NCLT, Patent, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, RERA, Startup, Succession Certificate, Supreme Court, Tax, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate D R Agrawal

Advocate D R Agrawal

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Immigration, Insurance, International Law, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, NCLT, Patent, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, RERA, Startup, Succession Certificate, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Revenue, Supreme Court

Get Advice
Advocate Amar Singh

Advocate Amar Singh

Arbitration, Breach of Contract, Civil, High Court, Insurance, Domestic Violence, Muslim Law, Landlord & Tenant, Anticipatory Bail, Banking & Finance, Consumer Court, Cyber Crime, Armed Forces Tribunal, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Child Custody, Cheque Bounce, Court Marriage, Corporate, Divorce, Immigration, Documentation, Customs & Central Excise, GST, Criminal, Family, Labour & Service, International Law, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Recovery, R.T.I, Property, Patent, NCLT, Succession Certificate, Revenue, Wills Trusts, Tax, Trademark & Copyright, RERA, Startup

Get Advice
Advocate Mohammad Imran

Advocate Mohammad Imran

Anticipatory Bail,Bankruptcy & Insolvency,Banking & Finance,Breach of Contract,Cheque Bounce,Civil,Corporate,Criminal,Cyber Crime,Divorce,Domestic Violence,Family,High Court,Motor Accident,Muslim Law,NCLT,Patent,Recovery,Succession Certificate,Supreme Court,Trademark & Copyright,Wills Trusts,

Get Advice
Advocate Vyom Devani

Advocate Vyom Devani

Criminal, Cheque Bounce, Civil, Anticipatory Bail, Family, Labour & Service, Domestic Violence, Divorce, Court Marriage, Patent, Motor Accident, Trademark & Copyright

Get Advice
Advocate Sushil Kumar Pandey

Advocate Sushil Kumar Pandey

Anticipatory Bail,Arbitration,Armed Forces Tribunal,Bankruptcy & Insolvency,Banking & Finance,Breach of Contract,Cheque Bounce,Child Custody,Civil,Consumer Court,Corporate,Customs & Central Excise,Criminal,Cyber Crime,Divorce,GST,Domestic Violence,Family,High Court,Immigration,International Law,Labour & Service,Landlord & Tenant,Medical Negligence,NCLT,Patent,Property,Supreme Court,Tax,Trademark & Copyright,Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Siddharth Rai

Advocate Siddharth Rai

High Court, Labour & Service, NCLT, Civil, Criminal, R.T.I, Motor Accident, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Landlord & Tenant, International Law, Family, Immigration, Insurance, Domestic Violence, Documentation, Divorce, Customs & Central Excise, Cyber Crime, Court Marriage, Corporate, Consumer Court, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Banking & Finance, Armed Forces Tribunal, Arbitration, Anticipatory Bail, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Breach of Contract, Muslim Law, Property, Recovery, Patent, RERA, Startup, Trademark & Copyright, Succession Certificate, Supreme Court, Wills Trusts, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Ajay Kumar Jain

Advocate Ajay Kumar Jain

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, Domestic Violence, Family, Insurance, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, Patent, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, Startup, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Harsh Vardhan Singh

Advocate Harsh Vardhan Singh

Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Civil, Corporate, Court Marriage, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, GST, Family, Landlord & Tenant, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, Patent, Trademark & Copyright

Get Advice
Advocate Abhisek Ghosh

Advocate Abhisek Ghosh

Arbitration, Civil, Corporate, Criminal, Family, High Court, Trademark & Copyright, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Breach of Contract, Child Custody, Cheque Bounce, Banking & Finance, Anticipatory Bail, Consumer Court, Customs & Central Excise, Divorce, Cyber Crime, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Immigration, Insurance, International Law, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Medical Negligence, NCLT, Patent, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, RERA, Startup, Motor Accident, Media and Entertainment, Succession Certificate, Supreme Court, Tax, Wills Trusts, Revenue, Armed Forces Tribunal, Court Marriage

Get Advice

Patent Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Breach of Contract. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.