- 26-Apr-2025
- Personal Injury Law
Notwithstanding anything contained in the preceding provisions of this Chapter, the State Government may direct that any cases or class of cases committed for trial in any district may be tried in any sessions division:
Provided that such direction is not repugnant to any direction previously issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court under the Constitution, or under this Sanhita or any other law for the time being in force.
This section grants the State Government the authority to direct that certain cases or classes of cases, which are committed for trial in one district, may instead be tried in a different sessions division. However, this direction must not conflict with any existing orders from the High Court or the Supreme Court.
The State Government can direct that cases committed for trial in one district may be tried in any sessions division.
Yes, the direction must not contradict any prior direction issued by the High Court or the Supreme Court.
The section applies to any cases or class of cases committed for trial, but must adhere to higher court directives.
Example of Case Reassignment: If a high-profile case is committed for trial in District A, the State Government may decide that it should be tried in the sessions division of District B for reasons such as security or public interest.
Section 205 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, empowers the State Government to reassign cases to different sessions divisions, ensuring flexibility in the judicial process while maintaining compliance with higher court orders.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.