- 24-Apr-2025
- Healthcare and Medical Malpractice
(1) In every inquiry or trial, for the purpose of enabling the accused personally to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him, the Court—
Provided that in a summon-case, where the Court has dispensed with the personal attendance of the accused, it may also dispense with his examination under clause (b).
(2) No oath shall be administered to the accused when he is examined under sub-section (1).
(3) The accused shall not render himself liable to punishment by refusing to answer such questions, or by giving false answers to them.
(4) The answers given by the accused may be taken into consideration in such inquiry or trial, and put in evidence for or against him in any other inquiry into, or trial for, any other offence which such answers may tend to show he has committed.
(5) The Court may take help of Prosecutor and Defence Counsel in preparing relevant questions which are to be put to the accused and the Court may permit filing of written statement by the accused as sufficient compliance of this section.
Section 351 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 outlines the procedures regarding the examination of the accused during an inquiry or trial. Key points include:
To enable the accused to personally explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him.
The Court can question the accused at any stage, especially after the prosecution witnesses have been examined.
No, no oath shall be administered to the accused when examined under this section.
No, the accused shall not render himself liable to punishment for refusing to answer or for giving false answers.
The answers may be taken into consideration in the current inquiry or trial and may be used as evidence in any other inquiry or trial related to other offences.
Yes, the Court may take help from the Prosecutor and Defence Counsel in preparing relevant questions.
- Scenario: During a trial, the Court questions the accused about discrepancies in witness testimonies.
- Outcome: The accused is given the opportunity to explain these discrepancies without being under oath.
- Scenario: The accused chooses to provide a written statement instead of answering questions in person.
- Outcome: The Court accepts the written statement as sufficient compliance with the examination process.
Section 351 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 establishes a framework for the examination of the accused in criminal proceedings. It ensures that the accused can explain evidence against them while providing protections against self-incrimination. The involvement of legal counsel is encouraged, and answers provided may have implications for other legal matters.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.