- 09-Nov-2025
- public international law
Extradition involving crimes punishable by the death penalty is a sensitive issue globally due to varying legal stances on capital punishment. Many countries that have abolished the death penalty impose conditions or refuse extradition unless assurances are given that the death sentence will not be carried out, balancing respect for sovereignty and human rights.
Several countries, especially those opposed to the death penalty (e.g., India, European nations), require formal diplomatic assurances from the requesting state that the death penalty will not be imposed or executed.
The accused may be extradited only if the requesting country agrees to commute the death sentence to a lesser punishment or guarantees a fair trial.
Extradition treaties often include clauses restricting extradition for capital offenses unless such assurances are provided.
International human rights bodies advocate against extradition where the individual faces a real risk of execution, emphasizing the right to life and protection from cruel punishment.
Courts in the requested country examine the risk of the death penalty and may halt extradition proceedings if assurances are inadequate.
Some countries, like the USA, may proceed with extradition without such conditions, depending on bilateral treaties.
An Indian citizen accused of murder is sought by a country where the death penalty is enforced.
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.