- 08-Nov-2025
- public international law
India retains the death penalty under its legal system but exercises caution when dealing with extradition requests involving capital offenses. India seeks to uphold its international human rights commitments while protecting its sovereignty and legal interests by requiring assurances before proceeding with extradition in such cases.
India typically requires diplomatic assurances from the requesting country that the death penalty will not be imposed or executed before consenting to extradition for capital crimes.
India aligns with global human rights norms advocating against arbitrary execution and insists on fair trial guarantees for the accused.
The Indian Extradition Act, 1962, allows extradition but does not explicitly prohibit extradition for capital offenses. However, India’s practice reflects sensitivity to death penalty issues.
In cases involving the death penalty, India often engages in diplomatic negotiations to obtain written assurances to protect the accused’s rights.
India’s extradition treaties often include clauses related to capital punishment, reflecting a balanced approach respecting bilateral agreements.
India has granted extradition with conditions in recent high-profile cases, ensuring no death penalty will be carried out without India’s consent.
A foreign country requests extradition of an Indian national accused of terrorism, punishable by death in that country.
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.