In India, the term international arbitration is defined under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which governs all arbitration-related matters in India. Section 2(1)(f) of the Act provides the legal framework for when arbitration is considered international under Indian law. An arbitration is considered international primarily when there are cross-border elements, such as the involvement of foreign parties, the location of the arbitration, or the nature of the dispute itself.
According to Section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitration is considered international if any of the following criteria are met:
The arbitration is international if at least one of the parties is a foreign national, a foreign company, or is based in a foreign country. For example:
The location or seat of the arbitration plays a crucial role in determining whether the arbitration is international. An arbitration can be considered international even if one party is Indian if the seat of arbitration is located outside India. For example:
The subject matter of the dispute must have an international dimension. For example:
When the arbitration agreement specifies that the dispute will be resolved through arbitration under international rules (like ICC, SIAC, or LCIA) and involves multiple jurisdictions, it is considered an international arbitration.
When the arbitration agreement or the arbitration rules agreed upon by the parties reference foreign legal frameworks or institutions (such as UNCITRAL, LCIA, or ICC), it can indicate that the arbitration is international. For example:
An arbitration involving foreign elements may lead to awards that need to be recognized and enforced in a foreign country, which would require compliance with international treaties like the New York Convention. Therefore, the need for cross-border recognition is another sign of international arbitration.
An Indian company enters into a contract with a French company for the supply of goods. The contract includes an arbitration clause stating that any disputes will be resolved through arbitration in New York under the ICC Rules.
Since there is a foreign party (French company), and the arbitration will take place in New York under an international framework, this arbitration is considered international under Indian law, even though one of the parties is Indian.
Two Indian companies enter into a contract to resolve any future disputes through arbitration in Singapore under the rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).
Although both parties are Indian, the arbitration has a foreign seat (Singapore) and is governed by international arbitration rules, so it is considered international arbitration under Indian law.
An Indian company and a Chinese company sign an agreement where they agree to resolve any disputes through arbitration in Delhi, but they specify that the rules of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) will apply.
Even though the arbitration will take place in India, the use of HKIAC rules, which is a foreign arbitration institution, and the involvement of a foreign party make this arbitration international.
Under Indian law, an arbitration is considered international when there are cross-border elements involved, such as the presence of foreign parties, the seat of arbitration being located outside India, or the use of international arbitration rules and frameworks. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, defines and governs these aspects, ensuring that international arbitrations are conducted efficiently in accordance with global standards. India’s adoption of international treaties like the New York Convention further strengthens the enforcement of international arbitration awards, making India an important player in global dispute resolution.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
