- 14-Jun-2025
- Elder & Estate Planning law
Foreign arbitral awards are generally recognized and enforced in India under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which implements the New York Convention 1958. However, Indian courts retain the authority to challenge or refuse enforcement of such awards on limited and specific legal grounds. This ensures a balance between respecting international arbitration and protecting parties against unfair or illegal awards.
The enforcement and challenge of foreign awards are governed primarily by Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Section 48 provides the exclusive grounds upon which enforcement can be refused or challenged.
Invalid Arbitration Agreement: The arbitration agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or under Indian law.
Lack of Proper Notice or Due Process: The party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice or was unable to present their case.
Excess of Jurisdiction: The award deals with matters not contemplated in the arbitration agreement.
Award Not Yet Binding or Set Aside: The award has not yet become binding on the parties or has been set aside by a competent authority in the country where it was made.
Non-Arbitrability: The subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable under Indian law.
Public Policy Violation: The enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of India.
The public policy exception is interpreted narrowly, focusing on fundamental principles such as fraud, corruption, or breach of natural justice.
Mere disagreement with the award or dissatisfaction is insufficient for challenge.
The challenge occurs at the stage of enforcement petition before the Indian courts.
The courts conduct a summary examination of the award based on the limited grounds under Section 48.
The court either grants enforcement or refuses it.
Unlike domestic awards, Indian law does not provide a separate mechanism to set aside foreign awards.
The only opportunity to challenge is during enforcement proceedings.
A UK-based company obtains a foreign arbitral award against an Indian company. The Indian company files to resist enforcement, claiming it was not properly notified of the arbitration and that the award conflicts with Indian public policy.
The Indian court examines if proper notice was given and whether the award violates public policy.
If the court finds merit in the challenge, enforcement may be refused.
If no valid ground is found, the award is enforced like a court decree.
Foreign arbitral awards can be challenged in India only on limited grounds during enforcement, ensuring a balance between honoring international arbitration and protecting justice.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
