What Is the Difference Between Void and Voidable

Definition: In legal terms, void and voidable refer to the validity of agreements or contracts. While both terms relate to the enforceability of legal documents, they have distinct meanings and implications.

Difference Between Void and Voidable:

1. Void:

• Definition: A void agreement or contract is one that is legally unenforceable from the beginning. It is considered null and has no legal effect.
• Nature: It is as if the agreement never existed. No legal rights or obligations arise from a void contract.
• Examples: Contracts involving illegal activities, agreements lacking consideration, or agreements made with persons who are not legally competent (such as minors or mentally incapacitated individuals) are void.
• Legal Status: A void contract cannot be enforced by law under any circumstances. It is invalid from the outset.
• Remedies: No remedies are required for a void contract as it is treated as if it never existed.

2. Voidable:

• Definition: A voidable agreement or contract is one that is initially valid but can be declared void by one or more parties due to certain legal grounds.
• Nature: It remains valid and enforceable until one party chooses to void it. The decision to enforce or void the contract lies with the affected party.
• Examples: Contracts obtained through coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, or undue influence are voidable. Contracts with minors may also be voidable at the minor's discretion.
• Legal Status: A voidable contract is valid until a party with the right to void it chooses to do so. The party affected by the legal grounds has the option to affirm or reject the contract.
• Remedies: The affected party may choose to rescind the contract, seek damages, or enforce the contract as per their preference.

Summary: A void contract is null and has no legal effect from the outset, making it unenforceable under any circumstances. In contrast, a voidable contract is initially valid but can be declared void by the affected party due to specific legal grounds. The key difference lies in the enforceability and the option to affirm or reject the contract.