A person is guilty of a public nuisance who does any act or is guilty of an illegal omission which causes any common injury, danger, or annoyance to the public or to the people in general who dwell or occupy property in the vicinity, or which must necessarily cause injury, obstruction, danger, or annoyance to persons who may have occasion to use any public right. However, a common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage.
BNS Section 270 defines public nuisance and establishes accountability for actions or omissions that harm the public or cause significant disturbance in a community. This section ensures that individuals cannot justify harmful actions merely by claiming they offer some benefits.
A1: A public nuisance occurs when an individual's actions or illegal omissions result in common injury, danger, or annoyance to the public or those living nearby.
A2: No, a common nuisance cannot be excused simply because it offers some convenience or advantage.
Example Scenario:
If a factory emits toxic fumes that affect the surrounding community, causing health issues and discomfort, it would be classified as a public nuisance under this section.
BNS Section 270 serves to protect public welfare by holding individuals accountable for actions that constitute a public nuisance, ensuring that such actions do not harm or inconvenience the community, regardless of any potential advantages they may provide.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.