Yes, a wrong diagnosis can be treated as medical negligence under Indian law, but only if it is proven that the doctor failed to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence expected from a medical professional in that particular field. Simply making an incorrect diagnosis does not automatically amount to negligence. To constitute medical negligence, certain legal elements must be established: 1. Duty of Care: The doctor must have owed a legal duty of care to the patient. This exists once the doctor agrees to examine or treat the patient. 2. Breach of Duty: It must be shown that the doctor did not follow the accepted standard of medical practice while diagnosing the patient. If a reasonably competent doctor in the same field would not have made the same mistake, this can be considered a breach. 3. Resulting Damage: The wrong diagnosis must have directly caused harm, injury, or worsened the patient's condition. If no actual damage occurred, it may not be actionable. Example situations that may qualify as negligence: Failing to conduct standard tests or ignoring test results Relying on outdated methods or obvious misinterpretation of symptoms Not referring the patient to a specialist when clearly required Diagnosing a serious illness as a minor issue, leading to delayed or wrong treatment Legal Remedies: A patient who has suffered due to negligent diagnosis can seek: Compensation under civil law (consumer courts or civil suits) Criminal action under Section 304A IPC for causing death by negligence (in rare and extreme cases) Professional disciplinary action through the Medical Council of India or State Medical Council In conclusion, a wrong diagnosis is considered medical negligence only when it deviates from accepted medical standards and causes actual harm. Courts will always consider expert medical opinions before holding a doctor liable.

Dear Client, In India, an error in the diagnosis that results from a failure to meet the standard of care expected of a professional medical officer and which causes injury to the patient can be said to be medical negligence. However, a misdiagnosis is not, in itself, negligence – the courts look to whether or not the doctor gave care consistent with professional standards for the particular circumstances. The Supreme Court in Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3180 held that negligence arises when a medical professional lacks the requisite skill or in the exercise of that skill to the standard of a reasonably competent practitioner in that specialty diagnosis is a skill that any competent doctor must be able to: interpreting clinical signs and the results of investigations as would any other qualified colleague with like qualifications. I.e. The Supreme Court laid down that to prove negligence, it must be shown that the medical professional failed to act with the skill of an ordinary competent doctor in that field. I hope this answer helps. In case of future queries, please feel free to contact us. Thank you.