Law4u - Made in India

Can the Information Commission penalize a PIO?

10-Jul-2025
R.T.I

Answer By law4u team

Yes, the Information Commission—both Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commissions (SICs)—has the authority to penalize a Public Information Officer (PIO) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 for failing to perform their duties as prescribed under the law. Here are the key points: 1. Legal Provision – Section 20 of the RTI Act, 2005 The Information Commission can impose a penalty on a PIO if: – They refuse to accept an RTI application – They fail to provide information within 30 days without reasonable cause – They maliciously deny the request – They provide false, incomplete, or misleading information – They destroy information or obstruct access to it 2. Amount of Penalty – The Commission can impose a fine of ₹250 per day of delay – Subject to a maximum of ₹25,000 3. Personal Liability – The penalty is imposed on the individual PIO, not the department – The Commission may also recommend disciplinary action under service rules if the violation is serious 4. Before Imposing Penalty – The PIO is given a chance to explain the reasons for the delay or denial – If the Commission finds that the PIO acted in good faith or had reasonable cause, the penalty may not be imposed 5. Examples of Penalty Situations – Deliberately withholding information – Not responding to RTI requests at all – Giving false or misleading information – Refusing to accept applications without valid reasons In summary: Yes, the Information Commission can penalize a PIO under Section 20 of the RTI Act for unjustified delay, denial, or misconduct in handling an RTI application. The penalty can go up to ₹25,000, and the Commission may also recommend departmental action if needed.

Answer By Ayantika Mondal

Dear Client, The Central or State Information Commission may in accordance with Section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005 penalize a Public Information Officer (PIO) for willfully providing false incomplete or misleading information failing to provide information without a valid reason or denying an application in bad faith. The maximum penalty is ₹25000 with a daily penalty of ₹250. In accordance with the relevant service rules the Commission may also suggest disciplinary action against the offending officer. I hope this answer helps. In case of future queries, please feel free to contact us. Thank you.

Answer By Anik

Dear Client, Yes it is a fact that the Info Commission has the authority to penalize Public Information Officers. This is a key feature of the RTI Act of 2005 which also puts in place measures for the prevention of citizens’ access to info being denied at will. Under Section 20 of the RTI Act the Central or State Information Commission has the authority to impose a penalty on a PIO when it is determined that they have acted without a reason cause:. Refused to receive an RTI application. Failed to report as required within 30 days. Maliciously denied the request for information. Provided false and imprecise info. Wiped out the information which was requested. Impeded the process in some other way. The charge is Rs. 250 per day for each day of delay which in turn is up to a max of Rs. 25,000. Also the Info Commission may put forward that which of the PIO’s service rules to bring in disciplinary action. Before we impose a penalty it is brought to the PIO’s attention. The PIO has the burden of proof to show that they acted in a reasonable and diligent manner. I hope this answer helps to resolve your queries. Don’t hesitate to reach out with any further questions. Thank you!

R.T.I Verified Advocates

Get expert legal advice instantly.

Advocate Gsr Raviteja Reddy

Advocate Gsr Raviteja Reddy

Civil, Consumer Court, Cyber Crime, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, Revenue, Banking & Finance

Get Advice
Advocate Anand C Makwana

Advocate Anand C Makwana

Anticipatory Bail, Armed Forces Tribunal, Banking & Finance, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Corporate, Court Marriage, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Insurance, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, Property, R.T.I, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Shyam Hada

Advocate Shyam Hada

Cheque Bounce, Civil, Criminal, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, Motor Accident, Tax, Revenue, R.T.I

Get Advice
Advocate Advocate Deepanshu Sahu

Advocate Advocate Deepanshu Sahu

Cheque Bounce, Civil, Consumer Court, Divorce, Family, High Court, Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Child Custody, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Documentation, Domestic Violence, Immigration, Insurance, Labour & Service, Muslim Law, Medical Negligence, Supreme Court, Succession Certificate, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, RERA, NCLT, Motor Accident, International Law, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Startup, Patent, Wills Trusts, Revenue, Trademark & Copyright, Tax, GST

Get Advice
Advocate Sangada Dinesh

Advocate Sangada Dinesh

Anticipatory Bail, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Court Marriage, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, R.T.I, Recovery, Revenue, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, Arbitration, Property

Get Advice
Advocate S N

Advocate S N

Anticipatory Bail, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, NCLT, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, RERA, Succession Certificate, Supreme Court, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Kiran Prajapati

Advocate Kiran Prajapati

Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Court Marriage, Criminal, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Motor Accident, Property, R.T.I, Revenue

Get Advice
Advocate Kaushal Kumar Yadav

Advocate Kaushal Kumar Yadav

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Cheque Bounce, Consumer Court, Corporate, Criminal, Cyber Crime, High Court, Labour & Service, Motor Accident, R.T.I, Supreme Court, Divorce, Family, Domestic Violence, Revenue, Muslim Law, Court Marriage, Civil

Get Advice
Advocate Aditya Chintada

Advocate Aditya Chintada

Civil, Criminal, Revenue, High Court, Consumer Court, Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Documentation, Motor Accident, Property, R.T.I, Wills Trusts

Get Advice
Advocate Rameshwar Singh

Advocate Rameshwar Singh

Armed Forces Tribunal, Cheque Bounce, Court Marriage, R.T.I, Breach of Contract

Get Advice

R.T.I Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Breach of Contract. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.