Home
Legal Advice
Documentation
What documents are required for loan agreement?

What documents are required for loan agreement?

05-May-2026

Documentation

Answer By law4u team

For a loan agreement in India, the exact documents depend on the type of loan (personal, business, secured, etc.), but there’s a standard set usually required. 1. Identity & KYC Documents As per norms of the Reserve Bank of India: Aadhaar Card PAN Card Passport / Voter ID / Driving Licence 2. Address Proof Utility bills (electricity, water, etc.) Rent agreement Aadhaar (if used as address proof) 3. Income Proof For salaried individuals: Salary slips (last 3–6 months) Bank statements Form 16 / Income Tax Returns For self-employed: ITR (2–3 years) Profit & Loss statement Business proof 4. Bank Statements Usually last 6–12 months to check financial stability 5. Loan Agreement Document This is the main contract, which includes: Loan amount Interest rate Repayment terms (EMIs, tenure) Default clauses Rights and obligations of both parties 6. Security / Collateral Documents (if applicable) For secured loans: Property papers (for home loan) Vehicle documents (for car loan) Gold valuation (for gold loan) 7. Additional Documents (if needed) Guarantor details and documents Post-dated cheques / ECS mandate Business registration documents (for companies/LLPs) Legal aspect Loan agreements are governed by general contract principles under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, meaning: There must be offer, acceptance, consideration, and free consent Terms should be clear and lawful

Answer By Ayantika Mondal

Dear client, for a loan agreement, you generally need KYC, address proof, income proof, and your bank statements. The agreement must clearly mention the loan amount, interest and its repayment terms. If secured, add the collateral documents, guarantor details may also be required in this. May this help and if you have any further issues do not hesitate to contact us.

Answer By Anik

Dear Client, The law allows you to file an application for domestic abuse against someone you've lived with before in India. However, this type of application will be governed by certain factors and therefore it's very important that you look into all case law related to domestic violence that has come before your current court's decision. With the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, cohabiting with someone who has an intimate relationship will be classified as a domestic relationship according to section 2(f) of the Act.This is the provision that extends the Act's protection beyond formal marriages to live-in relationships. However, not every live in arrangement automatically qualifies the courts have laid down specific tests. The Supreme Court in D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal first established that for a live in relationship to be treated as a relationship in the nature of marriage, the couple must have lived together for a significant period, must have presented themselves to the world as being akin to spouses, must have been of legal age to marry, must be otherwise qualified to enter into marriage, and must have voluntarily cohabited and held themselves out to the world as a couple. A mere walk in and walk out relationship does not qualify. One case that provided additional refinement was Indra Sarma v Vikram Sarma (2004). In this case, the Supreme Court of India examined whether a live-in relationship is a form of marriage for purposes of defining 'domestic partnership' in the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005). The Court concluded that not all live-in relationships will be classified as marital partnerships. In this case, the plaintiff (unmarried woman) was aware that the defendant was a married man with two children prior to moving into the household; hence, they were not considered domestic partners according to the Act. The Supreme Court held that women who start living with a married man while being aware of his marital status are not entitled to protection through the Act. However, the Court created an important exception stating that if a woman is unaware that her partner is married, she would still be entitled to protection. The guidelines the Supreme Court laid down in Indra Sarma to assess whether a live in relationship qualifies for protection include the duration of the relationship, whether the parties shared a household, financial interdependence between them, whether the woman entrusted domestic responsibility to the arrangement, and whether the couple presented themselves publicly as being in a marriage like relationship. Therefore, if two unmarried individuals live together in a genuine, stable, marriage like arrangement over a significant period, the woman can absolutely file a domestic violence complaint against the man. The complaint can seek protection orders, residence orders, monetary relief, and compensation. All of these remedies are available under the DV Act.