Home
Legal Advice
Criminal
Can an FIR be withdrawn after compromise?

Can an FIR be withdrawn after compromise?

24-Jun-2026

Criminal

Answer By law4u team

Yes, an FIR can be withdrawn or closed after compromise in certain cases, but it is not automatic and depends on the nature of the offence. Legal position under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita: FIR itself cannot be directly “withdrawn” by the complainant. However, the case can be: Quashed by the High Court, or Closed by police/court depending on stage and nature of offence. When compromise is possible: Compoundable offences: These are offences where law allows settlement. Compromise can lead to case being closed with court approval. Non-compoundable offences: Serious crimes (e.g., murder, rape, serious fraud) Compromise alone is not enough Only High Court can quash FIR in special circumstances Procedure after compromise: Parties prepare written compromise/settlement deed File application before: Magistrate (for compoundable offences), or High Court (for quashing FIR in non-compoundable cases) Court verifies: Voluntariness of compromise No coercion or pressure Nature and seriousness of offence Important Supreme Court principle: In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, the Court held that criminal cases with personal nature can be quashed even if non-compoundable, if justice demands. Limitations: Serious offences affecting society generally cannot be quashed even after compromise Court will not allow settlement in heinous crimes Conclusion: FIR cannot be simply withdrawn, but in many cases it can be legally closed or quashed based on compromise with court approval.

Answer By Naincy Kesharwani

Yes, an FIR can be legally resolved after a compromise, but it cannot be simply "taken back" or withdrawn at the police station. Because a registered FIR becomes an offense against the state, only a competent court has the authority to officially close or cancel it. Compoundable offences (certain less serious offences): The parties can file a compromise before the court, and the court may permit compounding of the offence. Non-compoundable offences: The FIR is usually not withdrawn merely because the parties settled. However, the parties can approach the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR/proceedings based on the compromise. The High Court has inherent powers to quash proceedings in appropriate cases, especially where the dispute is personal in nature (e.g., many matrimonial, family, or private disputes). Serious offences (such as murder, rape, serious corruption cases, and certain offences affecting society at large): Courts are generally reluctant to quash proceedings merely because of a compromise.

Answer By Anik

Dear Client, In India the power to withdraw or quash an FIR after a compromise depends entirely on the nature of the offense committed for minor private and compoundable offenses such as those involving family disputes personal grudges or petty theft the law allows the parties to settle the matter and have the FIR quashed by the High Court via using its inherent powers under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita which corresponds to the older Section 482 of the CrPC. The courts actively encourage such compromises in private disputes as they believe that restoring harmony between parties is more beneficial to the society than continuing a criminal litigation. However, for serious non compoundable crimes such as murder rape dacoity or crimes against the state a compromise between the victim and the accused is legally insufficient to withdraw an FIR. The courts have consistently held that these offenses are considered crimes against society as a whole and not just an individual and therefore cannot be settled privately, even if the victim signs an affidavit stating they have forgiven the accused the police is mandated to continue the investigation and the public prosecutor has a duty to pursue the case. If the person is involved in a case that is eligible for quashing the FIR the process requires you to file a petition before the High Court where the incident occurred attaching a notarized affidavit from the complainant confirming the compromise and their desire to end the proceedings. The High Court will then assess whether the settlement is voluntary and genuine before passing an order to quash the FIR, attempting to withdraw an FIR by simply not cooperating or ignoring police summons is not a valid legal process and can lead to adverse consequences. I hope this answer helps, if you have any further query kindly do not hesitate to contact us. Thankyou