- 18-Jun-2025
- Cyber and Technology Law
With the increasing digitalization of banking and rising incidents of elder financial abuse, the role of banks has become crucial in detecting and preventing fraudulent activities involving senior citizens' accounts. While banks are not law enforcement agencies, they do have specific responsibilities under RBI regulations and anti-money laundering laws to report suspicious transactions, especially if vulnerable customers such as the elderly are involved.
Yes, banks can and do alert authorities under certain conditions when suspicious or high-risk transactions are detected, particularly in the accounts of senior citizens. Here’s how:
As per Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, and RBI guidelines, banks must report unusual, large, or suspicious transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND).
If senior citizen accounts show signs of financial abuse (e.g., sudden large withdrawals, frequent third-party access), these may be flagged.
Banks use AI and behavioral analytics to track anomalies in transaction patterns, especially in vulnerable accounts.
Any change in signature, mobile number, or address triggers alerts. If foul play is suspected, banking officials may temporarily freeze accounts and inform higher authorities.
While banks cannot directly file police complaints in all cases, they may encourage the victim or family to do so and offer evidence.
In serious fraud cases, banks may involve the Cybercrime Cell or police directly, especially if a complaint is received.
RBI circulars urge banks to treat senior citizens as a priority segment, offering doorstep services, dedicated helpdesks, and extra vigilance on their accounts.
If a senior citizen’s account shows sudden unusual withdrawals or third-party manipulation.
When multiple complaints are received from the customer or family about suspected fraud.
In cases of digital fraud, phishing, or unauthorized online transactions, the bank may lodge a report with the Cybercrime Portal.
For forgery or impersonation, banks can lodge an FIR if they are custodians of evidence (like fake documents).
An 80-year-old man regularly withdraws small pension amounts. Suddenly, a new mobile number is linked, and multiple high-value UPI transfers are made to unknown accounts. A concerned branch officer finds the customer unresponsive to calls and notices frequent ATM use from a far-off location.
The bank flags the activity and generates a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) for FIU-IND.
The branch manager contacts the customer’s emergency contact or legal nominee.
If fraud is confirmed, the bank may file a complaint with the local cybercrime cell or assist the family in doing so.
The account is temporarily frozen to prevent further misuse.
The elder’s family can file an FIR under IPC Sections 420 (cheating) and 66C/66D of the IT Act.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Cyber and Technology Law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
