- 01-Nov-2025
- public international law
In international arbitration, the rules of evidence play a fundamental role in ensuring that the proceedings are fair, efficient, and transparent. Unlike national court systems, which follow strict and well-defined rules of evidence (e.g., common law or civil law systems), international arbitration offers more flexibility. The arbitration tribunal generally has the authority to determine the procedural rules for the case, including the rules on evidence. While some international arbitration institutions (e.g., ICC, LCIA, SIAC) have their own set of guidelines, a widely recognized set of rules is the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, which offer guidance on how to handle evidence in a fair and impartial manner.
Unlike national court systems, international arbitration offers flexibility regarding the rules of evidence. Tribunals have significant discretion in determining the types of evidence they will allow and the manner in which they will be presented.
The tribunal's primary goal is to ensure that both parties have a fair opportunity to present their cases and that the process is efficient.
The tribunal has the authority to decide whether specific evidence is admissible. There are generally fewer formalities regarding the admissibility of evidence in arbitration than in national courts.
Evidence such as witness statements, expert reports, and documents can be submitted without the strict formalities of court systems.
Example: In some jurisdictions, hearsay evidence may be admissible in arbitration, depending on the tribunal’s discretion.
Documentary evidence is often the most important form of evidence in international arbitration. The parties typically submit written documents that support their claims, such as contracts, emails, invoices, and reports.
The submission of documents is governed by deadlines, and the tribunal may decide whether certain documents should be excluded based on issues like relevance, authenticity, or timeliness.
Example: A party might submit an email chain to prove the intent of a contract. The tribunal would assess the authenticity and relevance of these documents.
Witnesses are often called to testify in international arbitration. Their statements are generally submitted in written form (witness statements) before the hearing.
The tribunal may allow oral testimony but is not bound by national rules on direct or cross-examination. The rules vary depending on the tribunal’s discretion.
Example: Witnesses may testify on the facts of the case, and their credibility can be assessed based on the testimony provided.
In complex matters (such as those involving technical or highly specialized knowledge), expert evidence can be essential. Experts may provide reports and appear to testify before the tribunal.
The IBA Rules allow for the appointment of joint experts in some cases, which can help streamline the process and minimize conflicts.
Example: In a construction dispute, an expert in engineering may testify to provide technical insights into the claims related to building specifications.
Arbitration generally operates under the principle of confidentiality, including the handling of evidence. This means that the evidence presented during the arbitration is typically not disclosed to the public, and parties are required to maintain confidentiality.
The tribunal may establish confidentiality agreements regarding the sharing of documents or witness testimonies.
Example: Sensitive business information presented as evidence in a dispute may be kept confidential to protect trade secrets or commercial interests.
The burden of proof generally lies with the party making a claim. In international arbitration, the claimant is responsible for proving the facts supporting its case, while the respondent has the opportunity to present its defense.
Example: If a claimant asserts a breach of contract, it must present evidence to show that the terms of the contract were violated and that the breach caused harm.
The International Bar Association (IBA) developed a widely used set of guidelines for the taking of evidence in international arbitration. These rules focus on transparency, fairness, and efficiency in managing evidence. They cover a broad spectrum of evidence-related issues, such as:
Example: The IBA Rules allow the tribunal to order the exchange of witness statements before the hearing, providing each party with an opportunity to review the other's evidence in advance.
Different arbitral institutions have their own procedural rules, which may also govern evidence-related issues. For example:
For ad hoc arbitrations, where there is no institutional framework, the parties typically agree on the rules of evidence. They may either adopt the IBA Rules or use general principles of fairness, flexibility, and efficiency.
Increasingly, arbitration involves the submission of electronic evidence, such as emails, digital documents, and even social media posts. Tribunals must determine the authenticity and relevance of such electronic evidence, which may involve technical procedures like digital forensics or data extraction.
Example: A party might submit screenshots of messages from a messaging app as evidence, which the tribunal will examine for authenticity and relevance.
In an international commercial arbitration between ABC Corp. (the claimant) and XYZ Ltd. (the respondent), ABC Corp. claims that XYZ Ltd. breached the terms of their contract.
ABC Corp. submits the contract, emails, and correspondence to show the terms of the agreement and XYZ Ltd.’s failure to meet its obligations.
Both parties submit written witness statements from employees who were involved in the negotiation and performance of the contract. During the hearing, both parties have the opportunity to cross-examine each other's witnesses.
An expert in international trade law is appointed to explain the legal ramifications of the breach, and both parties submit their experts’ reports. The tribunal considers the expert’s credibility in light of the evidence presented.
Both parties agree to keep sensitive commercial information disclosed during the arbitration confidential, as per the institutional rules and arbitration agreement.
The rules of evidence in international arbitration offer flexibility and allow the tribunal to manage the process in a way that ensures fairness and efficiency. While arbitral institutions and procedural rules provide broad guidelines, much of the specific management of evidence lies with the discretion of the tribunal. This flexibility distinguishes international arbitration from national court systems, where strict rules of evidence often apply.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
