- 22-Sep-2025
- public international law
The principle of good faith is fundamental to the arbitration process, ensuring that parties act honestly, cooperatively, and transparently throughout the proceedings. It fosters a spirit of fairness and integrity, contributing to the smooth functioning of the arbitration and upholding its credibility. Good faith not only applies to the conduct of the parties involved but also to the arbitrators, who must manage the proceedings impartially and fairly. Failure to act in good faith can result in delays, abuse of process, and the possibility of annulment or non-enforcement of the arbitration award.
Good faith ensures that both parties in arbitration are committed to honesty and integrity in presenting their case. This is crucial because arbitration, by its nature, is a more flexible and private form of dispute resolution compared to court litigation. Parties are expected to share relevant information and cooperate to enable the arbitrators to reach a just decision.
Parties must avoid hiding critical information or misleading the tribunal. Transparency allows for a fair assessment of the issues at hand, promoting confidence in the arbitral process.
Good faith requires both parties to cooperate in the conduct of the proceedings. This includes adhering to timelines, engaging in settlement negotiations in good spirit, and avoiding unnecessary delays. A failure to cooperate or deliberately obstruct the process can be considered a breach of good faith.
The parties should act in a manner that promotes the efficient conduct of the proceedings. For instance, not engaging in tactics that unnecessarily prolong the process (e.g., failing to disclose documents or making frivolous objections) helps avoid wasting time and resources.
Arbitrators are also bound by the principle of good faith. They must conduct the proceedings in a manner that is impartial, fair, and transparent. This includes ensuring that both parties have equal opportunities to present their case and that decisions are made based on merit, not bias or external pressure.
Arbitrators must act in good faith not only in the way they manage procedural matters but also in the decisions they make. This includes avoiding any appearance of bias and ensuring that awards are grounded in law and fairness.
If one party acts in bad faith—such as by making false claims, withholding information, or obstructing the proceedings—this can be considered an abuse of the arbitration process. The tribunal has the authority to penalize such conduct, which may include awarding costs against the party at fault or even rejecting certain claims or defenses.
Failing to act in good faith can lead to the annulment or non-enforcement of an arbitral award. Under the New York Convention and national arbitration laws, a party can challenge the award if it can be proven that the arbitration was conducted unfairly or in bad faith, which may include procedural violations by one of the parties.
In some jurisdictions, parties that fail to comply with the good faith requirement may face legal sanctions, including fines or other penalties for obstructing the arbitration process.
Good faith also encourages parties to consider settlement or mediation. Arbitrators may facilitate settlement talks, promoting resolution in a manner that is equitable to both parties. The principle of good faith supports settlement as it encourages both parties to act reasonably, without resorting to bad faith tactics like making unrealistic demands or using the process to delay resolution.
A tribunal may consider whether either party acted in bad faith during the arbitration in its final award. This includes factors like the unwillingness to engage in settlement negotiations, presenting unsubstantiated claims, or taking unreasonable positions that prolong the process.
International arbitration frameworks, such as those provided by the ICC, LCIA, and UNCITRAL, all stress the importance of good faith in the arbitral process. The principle is widely recognized in international arbitration agreements and is embedded in various arbitral rules. Courts in different countries may also refer to the principle of good faith when enforcing or annulling arbitral awards.
While good faith is a universal principle, its specific application may vary across jurisdictions. For example, the civil law systems of many European countries place a stronger emphasis on the duty of good faith in all contractual relationships, including arbitration. In contrast, common law jurisdictions may focus more on specific instances of bad faith conduct rather than a general obligation of good faith.
A party in a commercial arbitration provides documents to the tribunal as required, fully and without delay, to ensure transparency. This is an example of acting in good faith, as the party is cooperating with the tribunal to facilitate a fair process.
A party engages in settlement discussions before the hearing, showing willingness to resolve the matter amicably and avoiding the need for a lengthy arbitration. This is a demonstration of good faith as the party seeks a reasonable and fair resolution.
A party deliberately withholds critical evidence, knowing that the evidence would weaken their case if revealed. This is an example of bad faith and can lead to the tribunal imposing costs or dismissing claims made by that party.
A party engages in tactics designed to delay the proceedings, such as filing frivolous motions or objections without any reasonable basis. This can be seen as bad faith and could result in the tribunal ruling against that party in terms of costs or procedural decisions.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
