- 25-Aug-2025
- Marriage and Divorce Laws
Mediation is often encouraged by courts and legal systems to resolve disputes amicably and reduce the burden on judicial infrastructure. However, in domestic violence (DV) cases, the primary concern is the survivor’s safety and timely justice. The question arises whether mediation can delay relief and protection in DV complaints and how the law addresses this balance.
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act does not mandate mediation before filing or hearing a DV complaint.
Courts may suggest mediation only if it is safe and appropriate and with the survivor’s consent.
DV cases require urgent attention due to the risk of ongoing harm.
Courts prioritize issuing protection orders and interim relief swiftly rather than lengthy mediation processes.
Sometimes, abusers may use mediation to delay proceedings or intimidate survivors into withdrawing complaints.
Courts are cautious and monitor mediation processes closely to prevent misuse.
Mediation must be voluntary; survivors cannot be forced into mediation as a condition for relief.
If the survivor does not agree to mediation, courts proceed without delay.
Various High Courts and the Supreme Court have emphasized that mediation should not be used to undermine the seriousness of DV cases.
Judicial discretion is exercised to ensure mediation is not a tool for harassment or delay.
While ADR mechanisms like mediation help in many civil disputes, DV involves power imbalances and safety risks that require special handling.
Courts may allow limited mediation on issues like custody or maintenance, but not on protection or safety matters.
Understand that mediation is optional and should never compromise your safety.
Insist on immediate protection orders before considering mediation.
Seek legal advice if mediation is suggested and you feel pressured or unsafe.
Report any intimidation or coercion during mediation to the court.
Use Protection Officers or NGOs to support you through the legal process.
In a Bangalore case, a survivor was pressured into mediation by the abuser’s family, causing a six-month delay in obtaining protection orders. The court later intervened, setting aside the mediation outcome and promptly issuing protection and maintenance orders recognizing the risk to the survivor’s safety.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Marriage and Divorce Laws. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.