Yes, the Supreme Court of India has the power to strike down laws made by Parliament if they are found to be unconstitutional. This power is based on the principle of judicial review, which is a core feature of the Indian Constitution. Legal Basis: Article 13(2) – Any law that violates Fundamental Rights is void. Article 32 & Article 226 – Empower courts to enforce Fundamental Rights. Article 141 – Decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all courts. When Can the Supreme Court Strike Down a Law? The Supreme Court can declare a law void or unconstitutional if: It violates Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Constitution) It goes beyond Parliament’s legislative competence (violates division of powers in 7th Schedule) It violates the Basic Structure of the Constitution (as held in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, 1973) It is arbitrary, unreasonable, or discriminatory It lacks due process or procedural fairness Important Examples: Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) – Part of the 42nd Amendment struck down for violating the Basic Structure Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – Section 66A of the IT Act struck down as violating freedom of speech (Article 19) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) – Part of Section 377 IPC decriminalized as it violated right to dignity and privacy Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) – Section 497 IPC (Adultery) struck down as unconstitutional and discriminatory Limits to This Power: The Supreme Court cannot rewrite or legislate new laws — only review existing laws. It must exercise this power carefully, respecting the principle of separation of powers between the legislature, executive, and judiciary. Conclusion: Yes, the Supreme Court can strike down laws passed by Parliament if they violate the Constitution. This is a key safeguard to protect citizens’ rights and uphold constitutional values in India.

yes, in the Indian supreme court has the authority to nullify laws passed by the parliament. This is a basic element of the structure of the constitution which we know as judicial review (Article 13). how judicial review works, The Supreme Court review what the parliament and state legislatures pass. Should the court determined that a law gis against any Article of the constitution that it can declare the law void. This power is to see to it that the parliament which is a legislative body does not transgress the limits of the constitution. Grounds for sticking Down a law, Violation of Fundamental Rights: The constitution protects certain Fundamental Rights which the law in question does not respect (for example right to equality, freedom of speech etc. . Exceeding Legislative Competence: The Parliament enacts a law which is outside of the domains specified in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Violation of the Basic Structure: The law puts forth to change or do away with the Basic Structure of the Constitution which is a doctrine established in the case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala. The Basic Structure contains principles such as the preeminence of the Constitution, a democratic form of government, and the separation of powers. Landmark Cases Kesavananda Bharti case, the honorable supreme court put forth the “Basic Structure Doctrine” which gave the Supreme Court power to strike down constitutional amendments that change the basic structure. Furthermore, in Indra Sawney case, the Supreme Court nullified a government directive which introduced reserves for more than 50% of Backward Classes. I hope this will help you to resolve ur queries. if you any concern please don't hesitate to contact. Thank you!