What is injunction in breach of contract cases?

Law4u App Download
Answer By law4u team

Injunction is a judicial remedy granted by a civil court that requires a party to do or refrain from doing a specific act. In the context of breach of contract, an injunction is primarily used to prevent the breach of a negative stipulation in a contract or to restrain a party from acting against the terms of the agreement. It is governed by the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which continues to apply even after the enactment of the new criminal laws like BNS or BNSS, as it deals with civil remedies. Meaning and Nature: An injunction is an equitable remedy, which means it is not granted automatically but is at the discretion of the court. It is meant to prevent irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages. Types of Injunctions Relevant to Breach of Contract: 1. Temporary (Interim) Injunction: Granted during the pendency of a case to maintain the status quo. It is regulated by Order 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, and granted when: There is a prima facie case, The balance of convenience is in the applicant’s favor, There is a likelihood of irreparable injury if not granted. 2. Permanent (Perpetual) Injunction: Granted by a decree after full trial when the court finds that the plaintiff is entitled to restrain the defendant permanently from doing certain acts that breach the contract. 3. Mandatory Injunction: A rarer form of injunction, where the court compels a party to perform a certain act — for example, undoing what has been wrongfully done in breach of the contract. This is provided under Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act. When is Injunction Granted in Breach of Contract Cases? An injunction may be granted when: The contract contains a negative covenant (a promise not to do something) — for example, a clause that an employee will not work for a competitor during the term of employment. The breach involves irreparable damage that cannot be compensated with money. Damages are not an adequate remedy — like in contracts related to confidential information, intellectual property, or exclusive distribution agreements. The contract is of a type that cannot be specifically enforced (e.g., personal service contracts), but a negative obligation can be enforced via injunction. Legal Basis (under Specific Relief Act, 1963): Section 36: Injunctions generally granted to prevent breach. Section 37: Classifies injunctions as temporary or perpetual. Section 38: Lays down conditions for granting perpetual injunctions, particularly when the defendant invades or threatens to invade the plaintiff’s right. Section 39: Allows the court to grant mandatory injunctions to compel performance of certain acts to prevent breach or rectify the situation. Illustrative Example: Suppose A contracts with B, a software developer, that B will work exclusively for A for 2 years and not for any competitor during that period. If B tries to join a rival company during this time, A can seek an injunction to restrain B from doing so. Although courts do not enforce contracts of personal service directly (i.e., they won’t force B to work for A), they can restrain B from working with the competitor during the contract term if such a negative covenant exists. Limitations on Grant of Injunction: Courts are cautious in employment contracts, especially post-termination restraints, as they may be viewed as restraint of trade under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Injunctions are not granted where monetary compensation is adequate. If the plaintiff has not come to court with clean hands or has delayed unnecessarily, the injunction may be denied. Injunctions cannot be used to enforce illegal contracts. Recent Legal Trends: Indian courts, especially post-2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act, have shown a shift toward granting specific performance and injunctions more liberally in commercial contracts, especially where the contracts involve public interest, strategic infrastructure, or are difficult to quantify in damages. However, the remedy remains discretionary, not automatic, and is subject to equitable considerations. Conclusion: Injunction in breach of contract cases is a powerful equitable tool used to prevent parties from acting contrary to contractual terms, particularly where damages would be insufficient. Governed by the Specific Relief Act and principles of equity, injunctions help ensure that the sanctity of contracts is preserved, especially where negative covenants or irreparable harm are involved. While not every breach gives rise to injunction, in suitable cases, courts use it to preserve rights and prevent unfair advantage or exploitation.

Answer By Anik

Dear Client, An injunction is defined as a court order directing a party to do something or to refrain from doing something. The aim of an injunction is to prevent a breach or any continuing wrongful conduct. In a breach of contract case, an injunction is generally granted to one party to get the other party to stop any conduct that might go against the terms defined in the contract between the two parties. This injunction can stop the party from doing various things like – selling property to a third party after agreeing to sell it to the other party to the contract as was defined under the terms of that contract. Under Indian law, an injunction is treated as a discretionary remedy given by the court when damages are inadequate. This means that the court holds the power to grant it or not. Injunction is governed by the Specific Relief Act, 1963. There are two main types of injunctions – 1. Temporary injunction – this is granted for a limited period of time during the pendency of the suit (while the case is still ongoing) to maintain status quo until the case is decided. This provision is given under Order XXXIX of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. Permanent injunction – It is granted at the time of the final order at the end of the case to ensure that there is no future breach. The court grants an injunction when there is a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicant and if it is clear that irreparable damage would be caused to the applicant if the injunction is not granted. I hope this answer helps. For any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you.

Breach of Contract Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Breach of Contract. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.